Yep, we may get a tiny thank-you (read: commission) when you buy through
links on Auralockr — not enough for a yacht, but enough to keep the lights (and
servers) on.
Learn more
99
Highlights
57
Differences
2
Reactions
0
Likes
SmoothSkin Bare+
vs
Philips Lumea 9000:
99 Highlights & 57 Differences —
So, Which IPL & Laser Hair Removal Device Actually Works Better
SmoothSkin Bare+ goes all-in on speed and simplicity, while Philips Lumea 9000 brings smart sensors and serious power. The winner might surprise you.
We ran a full comparison of SmoothSkin Bare+ and Philips Lumea 9000 — diving into width, depth, height & skin tone range supported, standout features, and what makes each ipl & laser hair removal device unique.
46 % higher hair reduction efficiency
Percentage of hair reduction achieved after a full treatment cycle. Higher values indicate more effective performance.
90 %
vs
44 %
46 % higher hair reduction efficiency
Percentage of hair reduction achieved after a full treatment cycle. Higher values indicate more effective performance.
90 %
vs
44 %
SmoothSkin Bare+ vs Philips Lumea 9000: Which IPL Hair Removal Device Wins the Smart Beauty Battle?
When comparing the SmoothSkin Bare+ and the Philips Lumea 9000, it’s easy to see why both are among the top-rated at-home IPL (Intense Pulsed Light) devices. Each promises salon-like results from the comfort of home, yet their approach and design philosophies differ. Both models are handheld, designed for multiple areas such as the face, arms, legs, underarms, and bikini line. However, the Philips Lumea 9000 extends coverage even further to include the back and chest — ideal for users seeking more body coverage.
At a glance, both offer skin tone compatibility and safety features such as automatic skin detection, eye protection, and CE/FDA certifications. Yet, when it comes to performance, energy output, and advanced smart functions, the Lumea 9000 positions itself as a premium solution — reflected in both its features and its higher price point. Meanwhile, the SmoothSkin Bare+ shines as a budget-friendly alternative with impressive speed and efficiency for its size.
Why SmoothSkin Bare+ Still Impresses
The SmoothSkin Bare+ remains a favorite among users who want simplicity, speed, and value. Its 0.6-second flash speed outpaces most competitors, including the Philips Lumea 9000, which averages 2.4 seconds between flashes. This difference can mean completing a full-body treatment in just 10 minutes — perfect for those with limited time.
Though it offers only one flash intensity level, its consistent 4 J/cm² energy output still provides visible results in as little as four weeks. The inclusion of a fan-based cooling system and active cooling features make treatments more comfortable — an important consideration for sensitive users. It also features air-cooling technology, which helps maintain steady performance even during continuous use.
Design-wise, the Bare+ is compact and ultra-light at just 0.44 lbs, allowing easy one-hand operation. Its Safety Mode Selection and overheat protection offer reassurance for first-time IPL users. It may lack app connectivity or multiple attachments, but it compensates with straightforward usability and a treatment speed few can rival at its price point — currently available for $109 at Amazon.
Where Philips Lumea 9000 Takes the Lead
The Philips Lumea 9000 is built for users who want precision, personalization, and the latest smart technology in their IPL routine. It uses a combined sensor system that adjusts light intensity automatically to suit skin tone — making it safer and more efficient across multiple areas of the body. Unlike the Bare+, it offers five adjustable flash levels and a more powerful 5 J/cm² energy density, with up to 23 Joules of energy per flash.
Though it’s heavier and bulkier, the ergonomic pistol-grip design provides stability during longer sessions. The device also supports app connectivity, letting users track treatments and receive personalized guidance. The built-in treatment progress tracker is particularly useful for consistent users who follow multi-week regimens.
The Philips Lumea also includes four specialized attachments — for face, body, bikini, and underarms — ensuring precise light diffusion for each skin area. Its lamp lifespan of 400,000 flashes and 65W power rating ensure durability and long-term use. While its results take slightly longer to show (around six weeks), they often prove more permanent, with up to 90% hair reduction reported. The Lumea 9000 retails for $579.99 at Amazon.
Quick Take
The SmoothSkin Bare+ is all about fast treatments and minimal setup — it’s ideal for beginners and budget-conscious shoppers who want quick, consistent results without complex controls. Philips Lumea 9000, on the other hand, appeals to users who value adjustability, smart connectivity, and professional-grade performance at home.
In short: Bare+ delivers efficiency; Lumea 9000 offers precision and control.
Bottom Line
If affordability, simplicity, and speed are your top priorities, the SmoothSkin Bare+ easily justifies its price. It’s reliable, lightweight, and practical for smaller or regular touch-up sessions. However, if you’re looking for a comprehensive IPL solution with advanced features, more power, and smart functionality, the Philips Lumea 9000 is worth the investment.
Ultimately, these two devices target different audiences: the Bare+ excels as a fast everyday companion, while the Lumea 9000 positions itself as a luxury model for long-term, precise hair reduction.
Verdict
Winner: Philips Lumea 9000 – Superior power, versatility, and smart customization features make it ideal for users seeking premium IPL performance.
Runner-up: SmoothSkin Bare+ – Excellent value for quick treatments, lightweight design, and effective cooling performance at a much lower cost.
Side by side. The numbers. The features. No drama.
Looking for a smart comparison between SmoothSkin Bare+ and Philips Lumea 9000? We lined up every useful detail — from specs and user reviews to pros, cons, and pricing — so you can see how these ipl & laser hair removal devices really compare in the wild.
Philips Lumea 9000 covers more areas, including the back and chest, while SmoothSkin Bare+ focuses on smaller zones like face, legs, arms, and bikini. The extra coverage makes the Lumea 9000 better suited for full-body treatments.
Indicates which body areas the device is suitable for.
In the battle of Target Area,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
lower
12 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Target Area on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
SmoothSkin Bare+ supports a wider range of tones from light to dark, whereas the Philips Lumea 9000 stops at medium. That gives the Bare+ more flexibility for users with darker skin tones.
Shows which skin tones are supported.
In the battle of Skin Tone Compatibility,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
lower
38 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Skin Tone Compatibility on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
85
Philips Lumea 9000
0Votes
Black, Brown, Dark Blonde
vs
Hair Color Compatibility
Philips Lumea 9000 adds support for dark blonde hair, while SmoothSkin Bare+ only works on black and brown. Lumea’s broader compatibility means it’s better for users with lighter hair shades.
vs
Score History
Updated at 2025-12-11 05:02:03: 0Updated at 2025-12-23 03:19:23: 87Updated at 2026-04-02 04:58:41: 88
Score info for SmoothSkin Bare+:
We base our scoring on 'Hair Color Compatibility' on the following:
Score 88: Common effective hair color for IPL, indicating advanced capability. | Effective for IPL, closely related to high effectiveness range.. Score reduced because release date is older
Defines what hair colors the IPL is effective on.
In the battle of Hair Color Compatibility,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
lower
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Hair Color Compatibility on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
The Philips Lumea 9000 launched in 2022, two years after the SmoothSkin Bare+ in 2020. Lumea benefits from newer IPL advancements and smart features, while Bare+ remains a proven, budget-friendly older design.
Indicates when the model was released.
In the battle of Release Year,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
lower
26 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Release Year on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
SmoothSkin Bare+ is manufactured in the UK, known for its quality engineering, while Philips Lumea 9000 is made in China. The difference reflects their production scale and cost structure, not necessarily performance.
Tells where the product was originally manufactured/designed.
In the battle of Country of Origin,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
lower
6 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Country of Origin on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Usage Environment
Where can the device be used?
94
SmoothSkin Bare+
0Votes
Indoor
88
Philips Lumea 9000
0Votes
Indoor
Philips Lumea 9000
Keep dry; the power adapter is IP22 (drip-proof when tilted) but the device isn’t water-resistant.
Indicates whether the device is suitable for home use, professional salons, or both.
In the battle of Usage Environment,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
better than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
higher
6 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Usage Environment on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Portability
Is the device portable?
Yes
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
Yes
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
Philips Lumea 9000
Handpiece mass is ~0.9 lb (≈430 g)—about a small hair dryer—comfortable one-hand use.
Whether the device can be easily carried/travel-friendly.
In the battle of Portability,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
lower
6 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Portability on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Warranty Period
What is the warranty period?
2
years
0Votes
2
years
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
Standard coverage against manufacturing faults. Extendable via SmoothSkin registration.
Length of warranty coverage provided by manufacturer.
In the battle of Warranty Period,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
equal
2.00 years
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Warranty Period on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Model Name
What is the model name?
74
SmoothSkin Bare+
0Votes
Bare+
90
Philips Lumea 9000
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000 SenseIQ
Identifies the product for recognition and comparison.
In the battle of Model Name,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
lower
16 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Model Name on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Device Type
What type of device is it?
54
SmoothSkin Bare+
0Votes
Handheld
85
Philips Lumea 9000
0Votes
Handheld
Defines whether the device is handheld or desktop style.
In the battle of Device Type,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
lower
31 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Device Type on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Intended Use
Is it for home or professional use?
34
SmoothSkin Bare+
0Votes
At-home
88
Philips Lumea 9000
0Votes
At-home
Shows if intended for consumers, professionals, or dual use.
In the battle of Intended Use,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
lower
54 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Intended Use on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Gender Suitability
Who is the device suitable for?
94
SmoothSkin Bare+
0Votes
Unisex
90
Philips Lumea 9000
0Votes
Unisex
Specifies if the device is marketed for men, women, or both.
In the battle of Gender Suitability,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
better than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
higher
4 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Gender Suitability on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
At 5.7 inches (14.5 cm) wide, Philips Lumea 9000 is nearly twice the width of SmoothSkin Bare+ at 2.95 inches (7.5 cm). Bare+’s smaller frame feels lighter and more portable for quick sessions.
The overall width of the device body.
In the battle of Width,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
better than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
lower
2.8 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Width on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Philips Lumea 9000 is 3.7 inches (9.4 cm) deep versus SmoothSkin Bare+ at 1.77 inches (4.5 cm). The Bare+’s slimmer frame is easier to maneuver and store, especially for users with smaller hands.
The overall depth (front to back) of the device.
In the battle of Depth,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
better than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
lower
1.9 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Depth on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Philips Lumea 9000 stands taller at 7.87 inches (20 cm), compared to the compact 5.12-inch (13 cm) Bare+. The taller design allows better reach but makes Lumea bulkier for travel.
The overall height of the device.
In the battle of Height,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
better than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
lower
2.8 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Height on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Weight
What is the device weight?
0.44
lbs
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
SmoothSkin Bare+
About 0.2 kg, comparable to a compact electric shaver—easy to handle for longer sessions.
The overall weight of the device.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Weight on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Package Width
What is the package width?
Who knows?
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
10.6
inch
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
It's the same as 26.9 cm wide; roughly square box footprint with the height.
Width of the product packaging.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Package Width on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Package Depth
What is the package depth?
Who knows?
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
9.4
inch
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
Approximately 23.9 cm deep—shoebox-like size.
Depth of the product packaging.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Package Depth on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Package Height
What is the package height?
Who knows?
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
10.6
inch
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
Equal 26.9 cm tall—about the height of a sheet of A4 on its long edge; easy to shelf.
Height of the product packaging.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Package Height on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Package Weight
What is the package weight?
Who knows?
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
2.35
lbs
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
Equivalent 1.07 kg—as light as a 13-inch laptop in its box.
Indicates how heavy the packaged device is, important for portability and shipping.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Package Weight on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Folded Width
What is the folded width?
Who knows?
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Width when device is folded (if applicable).
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Folded Width on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Folded Depth
What is the folded depth?
Who knows?
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Depth when device is folded (if applicable).
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Folded Depth on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Folded Height
What is the folded height?
Who knows?
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Height when device is folded (if applicable).
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Folded Height on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Philips Lumea 9000 delivers 5 J/cm² compared to Bare+ at 4 J/cm². The extra energy gives stronger follicle penetration, resulting in faster and more permanent hair reduction.
Energy delivered per square centimeter during each flash.
In the battle of Energy Density,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
lower
1.0 J/cm²
measurement.
Based on community votes for Energy Density,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ earned
0 votes,
less than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉,
which got 1 votes.
The Philips Lumea 9000 hitting 5 J/cm² feels more powerful overall. I’d rather have stronger flashes for faster, longer-lasting results, even if it takes a bit longer per session.
SmoothSkin Bare+ flashes every 0.6 seconds, while Lumea 9000 takes 2.4 seconds between flashes — four times slower. Bare+ is faster for full-body treatments, saving significant time per session.
Time between flashes during treatment.
In the battle of Flash Speed Interval,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
better than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
lower
1.8 sec
measurement.
Based on community votes for Flash Speed Interval,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ earned
1 votes,
more than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉,
which got 0 votes.
Honestly, that 0.6 sec flash speed on the SmoothSkin Bare+ sounds way more convenient. I like when I can finish both legs in one go without waiting forever.
Philips Lumea 9000 runs at 65W versus SmoothSkin Bare+ at 10W, meaning it delivers stronger light intensity but also uses more power. Lumea’s higher wattage translates to deeper follicle targeting and faster long-term results.
Electrical power used during operation.
In the battle of Power Consumption,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
better than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
lower
55.0 Watt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Consumption on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Lumea 9000’s maximum output is 23 Joules, nearly double Bare+ at 12 Joules. This higher energy level translates to more powerful treatment sessions, offering salon-grade intensity.
Maximum light energy delivered per pulse.
In the battle of Max Energy per Flash,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
lower
11.0 Joule
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Max Energy per Flash on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
The Lumea 9000 emits 1.25 ms pulses compared to Bare+ at 1 ms. The slightly longer pulse helps distribute heat more evenly, reducing irritation for users with delicate skin.
Length of each flash pulse.
In the battle of Pulse Duration,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
lower
0.3 ms
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Pulse Duration on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
The Lumea 9000 has a 0.64 in² (4.1 cm²) window, larger than Bare+ at 0.46 in² (3 cm²). This wider coverage helps reduce the total number of flashes needed for large areas like legs or arms.
The surface area of the flash window.
In the battle of Treatment Window Size,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
lower
0.2 inch²
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Treatment Window Size on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
SmoothSkin Bare+ shows visible results in about 4 weeks, while Philips Lumea 9000 typically takes 6 weeks. Bare+ delivers faster early outcomes, ideal for users seeking quick improvements.
Indicates how soon users can expect to see visible hair reduction after starting treatment. Shorter timeframes are better for faster results.
In the battle of Visible Results Timeframe,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
better than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
lower
2.0 weeks
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Visible Results Timeframe on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Philips Lumea 9000 claims up to 90% hair reduction versus 44% for SmoothSkin Bare+. Lumea’s higher performance suits those wanting longer-lasting smoothness with fewer touch-ups.
Percentage of hair reduction achieved after a full treatment cycle. Higher values indicate more effective performance.
In the battle of Hair Reduction Efficiency,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
lower
46.0 %
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Hair Reduction Efficiency on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Philips Lumea 9000 offers five adjustable intensity levels, while SmoothSkin Bare+ provides just one. This flexibility allows Lumea users to tailor treatments by skin tone or sensitivity for better comfort control.
Number of adjustable intensity levels.
In the battle of Number of Flash Levels,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
lower
75 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Number of Flash Levels on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
SmoothSkin Bare+ uses a fan-based cooling system to reduce skin discomfort, while Philips Lumea 9000 has none. This gives Bare+ a comfort edge for sensitive skin or longer sessions.
Describes cooling system during treatment.
In the battle of Cooling Mechanism,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
lower
56 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cooling Mechanism on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Power Source
What is the power source?
44
SmoothSkin Bare+
0Votes
Corded
85
Philips Lumea 9000
0Votes
Corded
SmoothSkin Bare+
Plugs directly into standard outlets; ensures consistent energy output with no recharging downtime.
Philips Lumea 9000
Uses the included AC adapter only; there’s no battery or cordless mode.
vs
Score History
Updated at 2025-12-11 05:02:03: 0Updated at 2025-12-23 03:19:23: 88Updated at 2026-04-02 04:58:41: 87
Score info for SmoothSkin Bare+:
We base our scoring on 'Power Source' on the following:
Score 87: Provides continuous power via cord, basic but reliable power source.. Score reduced because release date is older
Defines how the device is powered.
In the battle of Power Source,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
lower
41 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Source on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Input Voltage
What is the input voltage?
84
SmoothSkin Bare+
0Votes
100–240V
85
Philips Lumea 9000
0Votes
100–240V
SmoothSkin Bare+
Universal voltage works worldwide with plug adapters—great for travelers.
Philips Lumea 9000
Worldwide voltage (50/60 Hz) so it works from US/EU/UK outlets with the right plug.
The voltage required for operation.
In the battle of Input Voltage,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Input Voltage on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Energy Level Intensity Range
What is the intensity range?
Who knows?
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Energy Level Intensity Range on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Single Flash Mode
Does it support single flash mode?
Yes
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
Yes
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
Philips Lumea 9000
“Stamp & Flash” for small zones (face/bikini/underarms).
Allows single, controlled flash for precision.
In the battle of Single Flash Mode,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
lower
7 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Single Flash Mode on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Continuous Flash Mode
Does it support continuous flash mode?
Yes
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
Yes
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
Philips Lumea 9000
“Slide & Flash” for legs/body—hold the button and glide to speed up coverage.
Whether the device supports automatic flash sequences.
In the battle of Continuous Flash Mode,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
lower
7 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Continuous Flash Mode on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Effective Energy at Follicle
What is the effective energy at the follicle?
4
J/cm²
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Indicates the actual energy reaching the hair follicle, which impacts how effectively the follicle is disabled.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Effective Energy at Follicle on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Auto Mode
Does it have auto mode?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
No
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
Automates treatment settings for ease of use.
In the battle of Auto Mode,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Auto Mode on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Manual Mode
Does it have manual mode?
Yes
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
Yes
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
Allows manual adjustment of all settings.
In the battle of Manual Mode,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
lower
6 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Manual Mode on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Philips Lumea 9000 operates up to 1200 nm versus Bare+ at 1100 nm, covering a slightly broader light spectrum for better compatibility across various hair colors and skin types.
Indicates the laser wavelength which defines skin and hair compatibility.
In the battle of Wavelength,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
lower
100.0 nm
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Wavelength on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
SmoothSkin Bare+ uses a simple optical sensor, while Lumea 9000 integrates a combined sensor system for smarter skin tone detection. This makes Lumea safer and more adaptive during treatments.
Identifies the kind of sensor used in the device.
In the battle of Sensor Type,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
lower
32 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Sensor Type on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
SmoothSkin Bare+ includes an active cooling feature, but the Lumea 9000 does not. Bare+ is more comfortable on sensitive areas, minimizing heat discomfort during longer use.
Provides cooling to reduce discomfort during use.
In the battle of Cooling Feature,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
better than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
higher
4 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cooling Feature on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
SmoothSkin Bare+ has no display, but the Lumea 9000 uses an LED interface for clearer operation and status feedback, making it easier to track settings during treatment.
Shows what type of display is used.
In the battle of Display Type,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
lower
90 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Display Type on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Philips Lumea 9000 includes smart app connectivity for personalized guidance, while Bare+ is fully manual. The app feature helps users follow correct schedules and monitor results.
Connects to smartphone app for tracking or guidance.
In the battle of App Connectivity,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
App Connectivity on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Lumea 9000’s built-in smart guidance assists with treatment timing and technique, a feature absent in Bare+. It’s ideal for first-time IPL users seeking safer, guided sessions.
Offers intelligent usage guidance to the user.
In the battle of Smart Guidance,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Smart Guidance on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Only the Philips Lumea 9000 includes a treatment progress tracker, helping users stay consistent over multiple sessions for better outcomes. Bare+ users must track manually.
Tracks and displays treatment sessions over time.
In the battle of Treatment Progress Tracker,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Treatment Progress Tracker on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Philips Lumea 9000 allows manual intensity control, while Bare+ does not. Users can fine-tune Lumea’s strength for different skin zones, offering greater personalization.
Lets user adjust intensity levels.
In the battle of Intensity Adjustment,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Intensity Adjustment on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
SmoothSkin Bare+ features a safety mode selector, while Lumea 9000 does not. This gives Bare+ an extra layer of control, ensuring safer operation for new users.
In the battle of Safety Mode Selection,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
better than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
higher
6 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Safety Mode Selection on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Skin Tone Sensor
Does it have a skin tone sensor?
Yes
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
Yes
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
SmoothSkin Bare+
Automatically prevents flashing on skin tones too dark for safe IPL treatment—adds an extra layer of safety.
Philips Lumea 9000
Blocks flashes if the skin is too dark and recommends an intensity for comfort.
Detects if skin tone is safe before flashing.
In the battle of Skin Tone Sensor,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
lower
7 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Skin Tone Sensor on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Contact Sensor
Does it include a contact sensor?
Yes
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
Yes
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
SmoothSkin Bare+
Ensures the device only activates when pressed against skin, preventing accidental flashes.
Philips Lumea 9000
Only fires when the window is flush against skin—an eye-safety and misfire safeguard.
Ensures device only flashes when in contact with skin.
In the battle of Contact Sensor,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
lower
7 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Contact Sensor on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
UV Filter
Does it have a UV filter?
Yes
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
Yes
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
SmoothSkin Bare+
Built-in UV filter shields skin from harmful ultraviolet wavelengths during each flash.
Philips Lumea 9000
Integrated filter reduces UV exposure to skin and eyes.
Blocks harmful UV light for safe treatment.
In the battle of UV Filter,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
lower
10 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
UV Filter on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
IPL Technology Type
What IPL technology type is used?
8
SmoothSkin Bare+
0Votes
Standard IPL
85
Philips Lumea 9000
0Votes
Standard IPL
Philips Lumea 9000
Not a laser: broad-spectrum xenon flash filtered to target melanin in hair follicles. (General tech context; PDP confirms IPL type.)
Defines the light pulse technology used.
In the battle of IPL Technology Type,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
lower
77 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
IPL Technology Type on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Auto Shut-off
Does it have auto shut-off?
Yes
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
Yes
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
Philips Lumea 9000
Device returns to standby after inactivity; unplug after use as advised in the manual.
Shuts down automatically when idle for safety.
In the battle of Auto Shut-off,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
lower
10 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Auto Shut-off on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Cooling System Type
What type of cooling system does it use?
64
SmoothSkin Bare+
0Votes
Air Cooling
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
SmoothSkin Bare+
The built-in fan helps prevent overheating during use, keeping treatments comfortable without the need for gels.
Describes the type of cooling technology used to minimize skin discomfort during treatment.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cooling System Type on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Dual Light Technology
Does it feature dual light technology?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
No
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
Indicates if the device combines two types of light sources (e.g., IPL + RF) for enhanced effectiveness.
In the battle of Dual Light Technology,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Dual Light Technology on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Integrated Safety Glasses
Does it have integrated safety glasses?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
No
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
Built-in protection for the eyes.
In the battle of Integrated Safety Glasses,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Integrated Safety Glasses on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Treatment Timer
Does it include a treatment timer?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
No
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
Tracks treatment time automatically.
In the battle of Treatment Timer,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Treatment Timer on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Replaceable Lamp Cartridge
Is the lamp cartridge replaceable?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
No
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
Allows replacing the lamp for longer use.
In the battle of Replaceable Lamp Cartridge,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Replaceable Lamp Cartridge on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Voice Assistance
Does it have voice assistance?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
No
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
Provides voice prompts for operation.
In the battle of Voice Assistance,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Voice Assistance on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Firmware Upgrade Support
Does it support firmware upgrades?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
No
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
Device software can be updated.
In the battle of Firmware Upgrade Support,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Firmware Upgrade Support on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Customizable Programs
Does it support customizable programs?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
No
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
Allows user to create custom treatment modes.
In the battle of Customizable Programs,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Customizable Programs on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
AI Skin Analysis
Does it offer AI skin analysis?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
No
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
Uses AI to analyze skin and adjust settings.
In the battle of AI Skin Analysis,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
AI Skin Analysis on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
SmoothSkin Bare+ uses a 510–1100 nm range, while Philips Lumea 9000 extends to 520–1200 nm. The wider range improves Lumea’s effectiveness across various skin tones and hair shades.
vs
Score History
Updated at 2025-12-11 05:02:04: 0Updated at 2025-12-16 03:47:40: 82Updated at 2025-12-23 03:19:23: 80Updated at 2026-04-02 04:58:41: 82
Score info for SmoothSkin Bare+:
We base our scoring on 'Lamp Color Spectrum' on the following:
Score 82: Intermediate bandwidth, slightly narrower upper range.. Score reduced because release date is older
Range of wavelengths emitted by the lamp.
In the battle of Lamp Color Spectrum,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
lower
32 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Lamp Color Spectrum on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Lamp Longevity
What is the lamp longevity?
Who knows?
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
85
Philips Lumea 9000
0Votes
400,000 Flashes
Philips Lumea 9000
400k flashes typically equates to years of full-body use for one user.
Total number of flashes supported before lamp wears out.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Lamp Longevity on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Lamp Type
What type of lamp is used?
64
SmoothSkin Bare+
0Votes
Xenon
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Identifies the technology used for the flash lamp.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Lamp Type on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Replaceable Lamp
Is the lamp replaceable?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
No
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
Whether the lamp can be replaced by the user.
In the battle of Replaceable Lamp,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Replaceable Lamp on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Lamp Change Indicator
Does it have a lamp change indicator?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
No
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
Alerts user when lamp needs replacement.
In the battle of Lamp Change Indicator,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Lamp Change Indicator on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Lamp Lifetime Indicator
Does it show lamp lifetime?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
No
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
Displays remaining flash count or lamp life.
In the battle of Lamp Lifetime Indicator,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Lamp Lifetime Indicator on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Pre-flash Cooling
Does it include pre-flash cooling?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
No
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
Provides cooling before each flash for comfort.
In the battle of Pre-flash Cooling,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Pre-flash Cooling on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Cartridge Compatibility
What cartridges are compatible?
Who knows?
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Indicates which cartridges are compatible with the device.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cartridge Compatibility on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Lamp Material
What material is the lamp made of?
58
SmoothSkin Bare+
0Votes
Glass
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs
Score History
Updated at 2025-12-11 05:02:04: 0Updated at 2025-12-16 03:47:40: 84Updated at 2025-12-23 03:19:23: 82Updated at 2026-04-02 04:58:41: 80
Score info for SmoothSkin Bare+:
We base our scoring on 'Lamp Material' on the following:
Score 80: Glass is a basic, common lamp material but less advanced than quartz.. Score reduced because release date is older
Material composition of the lamp (e.g., quartz glass).
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Lamp Material on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Bare+ covers light to dark skin tones, while Lumea stops at medium. This makes Bare+ more inclusive for users with darker complexions.
vs
Score History
Updated at 2025-12-11 05:02:04: 0Updated at 2025-12-16 03:47:40: 88Updated at 2025-12-23 03:19:23: 85Updated at 2026-04-02 04:58:41: 88
Score info for SmoothSkin Bare+:
We base our scoring on 'Skin Tone Range Supported' on the following:
Score 88: Represents a basic and limited range for skin tones. | Indicates an expanded but still common skin tone category. | Covers the darkest skin tone range, showing full inclusion within the list.. Score reduced because release date is older
Defines the full range of skin tones supported.
In the battle of Skin Tone Range Supported,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
lower
33 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Skin Tone Range Supported on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Bare+ supports Fitzpatrick types I–V, while Lumea 9000 supports I–IV. The Bare+ works for a slightly wider range of skin tones, particularly deeper ones.
Identifies the Fitzpatrick skin types safe for use.
In the battle of Fitzpatrick Scale Compatibility,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
lower
43 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Fitzpatrick Scale Compatibility on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
85
Philips Lumea 9000
0Votes
Black, Brown, Dark Blonde
vs
Hair Color Range Supported
Philips Lumea 9000 supports dark blonde hair in addition to black and brown, while Bare+ does not. Lumea appeals to a broader range of users with lighter hair tones.
Defines the hair colors that respond well to IPL.
In the battle of Hair Color Range Supported,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
better than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
higher
4 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Hair Color Range Supported on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Sensitive Skin Mode
Does it have sensitive skin mode?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
No
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
Provides gentler settings for sensitive skin.
In the battle of Sensitive Skin Mode,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Sensitive Skin Mode on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Facial Hair Compatibility
Is it compatible with facial hair?
Yes
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
Yes
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
Safe and effective for facial hair use.
In the battle of Facial Hair Compatibility,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
lower
9 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Facial Hair Compatibility on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Body Hair Compatibility
Is it compatible with body hair?
Yes
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
Yes
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
Designed for larger body areas like arms and legs.
In the battle of Body Hair Compatibility,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
lower
7 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Body Hair Compatibility on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Bikini Line Compatibility
Is it safe for bikini line?
Yes
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
Yes
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
Safe for sensitive bikini area treatment.
In the battle of Bikini Line Compatibility,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
lower
6 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Bikini Line Compatibility on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Underarm Compatibility
Can it be used on underarms?
Yes
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
Yes
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
Effective and safe for underarm area.
In the battle of Underarm Compatibility,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
lower
6 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Underarm Compatibility on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Leg Compatibility
Is it compatible with leg hair?
Yes
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
Yes
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
Suitable for use on legs.
In the battle of Leg Compatibility,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
lower
6 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Leg Compatibility on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Chest/Back Compatibility
Can it be used on chest or back?
Yes
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
Yes
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
Safe for use on chest and back hair.
In the battle of Chest/Back Compatibility,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
lower
9 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Chest/Back Compatibility on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Beard Compatibility
Is it safe for beard use?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
No
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
Determines if device can be used on beard hair.
In the battle of Beard Compatibility,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Beard Compatibility on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Tattoo Area Safety
Is it safe around tattoos?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
No
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
Ensures safe avoidance of tattooed skin areas.
In the battle of Tattoo Area Safety,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
better than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Tattoo Area Safety on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
SmoothSkin Bare+ is CE-certified, but the Philips Lumea 9000 is not. This may reassure European users seeking compliance with EU safety standards.
Indicates compliance with European safety standards.
In the battle of CE Certification,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
better than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
higher
6 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
CE Certification on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Bare+ includes overheat protection, which the Lumea 9000 lacks. This makes the Bare+ safer for extended sessions without performance loss.
Prevents overheating during long use.
In the battle of Overheat Protection,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
better than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
higher
6 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Overheat Protection on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
FDA Approval
Is the device FDA approved?
Yes
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
Yes
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
SmoothSkin Bare+
FDA-cleared for safe home use on face and body—reassures quality and safety compliance.
Philips Lumea 9000
Framing note: this device is FDA-cleared for home-use IPL.
Confirms approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
In the battle of FDA Approval,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
lower
9 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
FDA Approval on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
IEC Safety Certification
Does it have IEC safety certification?
Yes
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
Yes
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
Philips Lumea 9000
Manual cites IEC 60601-1-2 EMC and medical device safety classifications.
Compliance with International Electrotechnical Commission standards.
In the battle of IEC Safety Certification,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
lower
10 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
IEC Safety Certification on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Automatic Skin Detection
Does it have automatic skin detection?
Yes
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
Yes
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
Philips Lumea 9000
SmartSkin prevents use on unsuitable tones; adds a safety layer in addition to manual checks.
Detects skin before flashing to prevent misuse.
In the battle of Automatic Skin Detection,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
lower
7 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Automatic Skin Detection on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Eye Safety Protection
Does it have eye safety protection?
Yes
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
Yes
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
Philips Lumea 9000
Contact sensor + integrated filters help avoid stray flashes; use in a well-lit room to reduce afterimages.
Ensures flashes are safe for eyes with built-in shielding.
In the battle of Eye Safety Protection,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
lower
10 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Eye Safety Protection on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Contact Safety Lock
Does it include a contact safety lock?
Yes
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
Yes
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
Philips Lumea 9000
Prevents accidental flashing unless the window is fully on skin.
Device locks unless in contact with skin.
In the battle of Contact Safety Lock,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
lower
10 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Contact Safety Lock on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
RoHS Compliance
Is the device RoHS compliant?
Yes
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
Yes
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
Confirms restriction of hazardous substances.
In the battle of RoHS Compliance,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
lower
10 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
RoHS Compliance on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Child Safety Lock
Does it include a child safety lock?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
No
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
Prevents accidental activation by children.
In the battle of Child Safety Lock,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Child Safety Lock on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Medical Grade Classification
What is the device classification?
34
SmoothSkin Bare+
0Votes
Consumer
80
Philips Lumea 9000
0Votes
Consumer
vs
Score History
Updated at 2025-12-11 05:02:04: 0Updated at 2025-12-16 03:47:40: 75Updated at 2025-12-23 03:19:23: 80Updated at 2026-04-02 04:58:41: 75
Score info for SmoothSkin Bare+:
We base our scoring on 'Medical Grade Classification' on the following:
Score 75: Typically represents basic, less regulated classification.. Score reduced because release date is older
Indicates if classified as consumer or medical-grade.
In the battle of Medical Grade Classification,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
lower
46 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Medical Grade Classification on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
78.7
inch
0Votes
vs
Cord Length
Philips Lumea 9000 has a long 78.7-inch (2 m) cord, offering better reach. Bare+ doesn’t specify length, suggesting a shorter cable, making Lumea easier to use around the body.
Measures cable length for ease of movement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cord Length on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
The Philips Lumea 9000 features a pistol grip for ergonomic control, while Bare+ has a straight handle. The Lumea’s shape suits larger areas, while Bare+ feels simpler and lighter for small zones.
Defines how the handle is shaped for comfort.
In the battle of Handle Design,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
lower
56 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Handle Design on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Lumea 9000 includes an angled head for better contact on curved areas, while Bare+ lacks this design. The Lumea’s head improves precision around knees and underarms.
Head angled for better access to body contours.
In the battle of Ergonomic Angle Head,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Ergonomic Angle Head on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
SmoothSkin Bare+ recovers cooling faster, while Lumea 9000 has no cooling system. Bare+ users benefit from smoother continuous sessions without heat buildup.
Returns to optimal cooling faster between flashes.
In the battle of Quick Cooling Recovery,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
better than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
higher
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Quick Cooling Recovery on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Philips Lumea 9000 automatically adjusts energy based on skin tone, while Bare+ remains manual. Lumea’s automation ensures optimized safety and comfort each use.
Adjusts intensity automatically based on skin type.
In the battle of Auto Energy Adjustment,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Auto Energy Adjustment on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Treatment Speed
What is the treatment speed?
10
minutes
0Votes
11
minutes
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
Roughly the time for a full-leg or body session, emphasizing its fast performance.
Philips Lumea 9000
Both lower legs in ~11 min (based on lowest intensity).
Time per flash or per treatment cycle.
In the battle of Treatment Speed,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
better than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
lower
1.0 minutes
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Treatment Speed on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Ergonomic Design
Does it have an ergonomic design?
Yes
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
Yes
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
SmoothSkin Bare+
Designed for one-handed operation with a smooth curved profile that minimizes wrist strain.
Ensures comfortable grip and handling during long sessions.
In the battle of Ergonomic Design,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
lower
4 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Ergonomic Design on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Ease of Cleaning
How easy is it to clean?
0
SmoothSkin Bare+
0Votes
Easy
80
Philips Lumea 9000
0Votes
Easy
SmoothSkin Bare+
Simply wipe with a dry, lint-free cloth; no water or cleaning fluids needed.
Describes how simple it is to maintain and clean the device.
In the battle of Ease of Cleaning,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
lower
80 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Ease of Cleaning on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Recommended Usage Frequency
What is the recommended usage frequency?
1
times/week
0Votes
1
times/week
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
Treatment phase: every 2 weeks (≈0.5×/wk); touch-ups monthly (≈0.25×/wk).
Specifies how often the device should be used per week for optimal results. Lower frequency indicates greater efficiency.
In the battle of Recommended Usage Frequency,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
equal
1.00 times/week
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Recommended Usage Frequency on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Grip Texture
What type of grip texture does it have?
4
SmoothSkin Bare+
0Votes
Smooth
80
Philips Lumea 9000
0Votes
Smooth
Indicates grip style for secure handling.
In the battle of Grip Texture,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
lower
76 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Grip Texture on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Adjustable Head Rotation
Does it support adjustable head rotation?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
No
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
Flash head can rotate to adjust treatment angle.
In the battle of Adjustable Head Rotation,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Adjustable Head Rotation on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Button Placement
Where are the buttons placed?
64
SmoothSkin Bare+
0Votes
Top
85
Philips Lumea 9000
0Votes
Front
vs
Score History
Updated at 2025-12-11 05:02:04: 0Updated at 2025-12-23 03:19:23: 88Updated at 2026-04-02 04:58:41: 85
Score info for SmoothSkin Bare+:
We base our scoring on 'Button Placement' on the following:
Score 85: Top placement is common but less ergonomic and less advanced compared to side placement.. Score reduced because release date is older
Location of main buttons for ease of control.
In the battle of Button Placement,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
lower
21 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Button Placement on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Replaceable Cover Design
Does it have a replaceable cover design?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
No
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
Allows cover replacement for hygiene or customization.
In the battle of Replaceable Cover Design,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Replaceable Cover Design on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Cooling Sensation Level
What is the cooling sensation level?
Who knows?
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Measures how much skin cooling is delivered for comfort.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cooling Sensation Level on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Pain Reduction Technology
Does it include pain reduction technology?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
No
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
Uses advanced tech to reduce discomfort from flashes.
In the battle of Pain Reduction Technology,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Pain Reduction Technology on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Pain Level Rating
What is the pain level rating?
Who knows?
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
User-reported pain level score.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Pain Level Rating on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Comfort Mode
Does it have a comfort mode?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
No
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
Special operation setting for gentler sessions.
In the battle of Comfort Mode,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Comfort Mode on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Vibration Level
What is the vibration level?
Who knows?
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Measures vibration strength to ensure comfort.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Vibration Level on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Vibration Feedback
Does it have vibration feedback?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
No
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
Gives haptic feedback when buttons are pressed or flash is ready.
In the battle of Vibration Feedback,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Vibration Feedback on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Indicator Lights
Does it have indicator lights?
Yes
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
Yes
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
Provides clear LED/light indicators for status.
In the battle of Indicator Lights,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
lower
4 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Indicator Lights on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Treatment Area Preview
Does it have a treatment area preview?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
No
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
Displays or projects the area to be treated before flashing.
In the battle of Treatment Area Preview,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Treatment Area Preview on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Ease of Use Rating
What is the ease of use rating?
Who knows?
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Score reflecting overall usability.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Ease of Use Rating on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Cleaning Method
What is the cleaning method?
54
SmoothSkin Bare+
0Votes
Wipe
85
Philips Lumea 9000
0Votes
Wipe
Type of cleaning method supported.
In the battle of Cleaning Method,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
lower
31 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cleaning Method on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
One-hand Operation
Can it be operated with one hand?
Yes
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
Yes
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
Device can be comfortably operated with one hand.
In the battle of One-hand Operation,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
lower
6 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
One-hand Operation on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Cordless Operation
Can it operate cordless?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
No
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
Device can be used wirelessly without power cord.
In the battle of Cordless Operation,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cordless Operation on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Lightweight Rating
What is the lightweight rating?
Who knows?
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Indicates weight level for easy handling.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Lightweight Rating on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Travel Lock
Does it have a travel lock?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
No
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
Prevents device from turning on accidentally during travel.
In the battle of Travel Lock,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Travel Lock on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Noise Level
What is the noise level?
Who knows?
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Indicates loudness of device during operation.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Noise Level on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Memory Function
Does it have a memory function?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
No
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
Saves last used settings for faster next sessions.
In the battle of Memory Function,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Memory Function on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Multi-user Profile
Can it store multiple user profiles?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
No
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
Allows multiple people to save personalized settings.
In the battle of Multi-user Profile,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Multi-user Profile on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Battery & Charging
15
Battery Type
What type of battery does it use?
Who knows?
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Defines what type of battery is used.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Type on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Battery Capacity
What is the battery capacity?
Who knows?
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Capacity of the internal battery in milliamp hours.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Capacity on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Battery Life per Charge
How long does the battery last per charge?
Who knows?
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Maximum runtime on a single full charge.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Life per Charge on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Flash Count per Charge
How many flashes per charge?
Who knows?
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Number of flashes supported before recharging is required.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Flash Count per Charge on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Charging Time
How long does it take to charge?
Who knows?
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Time required to fully recharge the battery.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Time on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Charging Method
What is the charging method?
Who knows?
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Type of charging system used.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Method on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Charging Port Type
What type of charging port does it use?
Who knows?
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Identifies port type for charging compatibility.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Port Type on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Fast Charging Support
Does it support fast charging?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
No
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
Allows faster than normal charging times.
In the battle of Fast Charging Support,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Fast Charging Support on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Wireless Charging Support
Does it support wireless charging?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
No
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
Can charge via wireless dock or pad.
In the battle of Wireless Charging Support,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Wireless Charging Support on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Pass-through Charging
Can it be used while charging?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
No
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
Can be used while charging.
In the battle of Pass-through Charging,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Pass-through Charging on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Battery Replaceable
Is the battery replaceable?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
No
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
Whether the battery can be replaced by user.
In the battle of Battery Replaceable,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Replaceable on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Battery Cycle Life
What is the battery cycle life?
Who knows?
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Number of full charges the battery supports before degrading.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Cycle Life on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Battery Indicator
Does it have a battery indicator?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
No
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
Shows charge level with LED or display.
In the battle of Battery Indicator,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Indicator on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Overcharge Protection
Does it have overcharge protection?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
No
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
Prevents battery damage from overcharging.
In the battle of Overcharge Protection,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Overcharge Protection on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Auto Power-off on Low Battery
Does it power off automatically on low battery?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
No
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
Device shuts off automatically when battery is too low.
In the battle of Auto Power-off on Low Battery,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Auto Power-off on Low Battery on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Philips Lumea 9000 includes a facial attachment for gentle use, while Bare+ does not. This makes Lumea more versatile for sensitive facial hair removal.
Special head designed for facial hair removal.
In the battle of Face Attachment,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Face Attachment on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Lumea 9000 includes a specialized bikini attachment, offering tailored comfort in delicate areas, unlike the Bare+. This adds flexibility for targeted use.
Narrower head for sensitive bikini area.
In the battle of Bikini Attachment,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Bikini Attachment on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Philips Lumea 9000 comes with an underarm attachment for curved areas; Bare+ lacks it. The addition enhances comfort and accuracy for smaller regions.
Specifically designed for underarm treatment.
In the battle of Underarm Attachment,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Underarm Attachment on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Only the Lumea 9000 has a precision head for detailed work, useful for face or upper lip areas. Bare+ users must rely on one general setting.
Small head for targeted treatment areas.
In the battle of Precision Attachment,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Precision Attachment on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
SmoothSkin Bare+ integrates a contact sensor for better skin detection, while Lumea 9000 does not. Bare+ provides more reliable flash activation during close contact.
Attachment with enhanced contact sensor for safe use.
In the battle of Skin Contact Sensor Attachment,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
better than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
higher
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Skin Contact Sensor Attachment on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Philips Lumea 9000 includes a travel pouch, while Bare+ lacks one. This makes Lumea easier to carry and store safely.
Carrying pouch or bag for portability.
In the battle of Travel Pouch/Bag,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Travel Pouch/Bag on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Lumea 9000 also includes a sturdy storage case, missing on Bare+. It adds protection and keeps attachments organized for travel.
Hard or soft case to store device and accessories.
In the battle of Storage Case,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Storage Case on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Number of Attachments
How many attachments are included?
Who knows?
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
75
Philips Lumea 9000
0Votes
4
Total count of interchangeable heads included.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Number of Attachments on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Cooling Gel Pack
Does it include a cooling gel pack?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
No
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
Helps soothe skin before or after treatment.
In the battle of Cooling Gel Pack,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cooling Gel Pack on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Protective Eyewear
Does it come with protective eyewear?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
No
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
Safety glasses to protect eyes from light pulses.
In the battle of Protective Eyewear,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Protective Eyewear on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Cleaning Brush
Does it include a cleaning brush?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
No
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
Small brush for cleaning attachments.
In the battle of Cleaning Brush,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cleaning Brush on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Replacement Lamp Cartridge
Does it include replacement lamp cartridges?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
No
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
Extra lamp cartridges provided with the package.
In the battle of Replacement Lamp Cartridge,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Replacement Lamp Cartridge on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Adapter/Charger
Does it come with an adapter or charger?
Yes
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
Yes
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
Confirms whether power adapter or charger is included.
In the battle of Adapter/Charger,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
lower
6 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Adapter/Charger on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
SmoothSkin Bare+ uses ABS plastic, while Lumea 9000 uses tougher polycarbonate. Lumea feels more premium and durable, ideal for frequent long-term use.
Material strength and durability.
In the battle of Material Durability,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
lower
26 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Material Durability on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
80
Philips Lumea 9000
0Votes
IP22
vs
IP Rating
Philips Lumea 9000 carries an IP22 rating, offering light moisture protection. Bare+ provides no rating, making Lumea slightly safer for humid environments.
Defines water and dust resistance.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
IP Rating on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Bare+ is rated for 10 years versus Lumea 9000’s 5 years. Despite fewer features, Bare+ has better long-term durability, ideal for consistent maintenance users.
Expected operational lifetime.
In the battle of Lifespan Rating,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
better than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
higher
5.0 years
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Lifespan Rating on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
80
Philips Lumea 9000
0Votes
FSC
vs
Sustainability Certification
Lumea 9000 is FSC-certified for eco-friendly packaging, while Bare+ has none. Lumea appeals more to environmentally conscious buyers.
Eco-certification showing sustainability.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Sustainability Certification on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Bare+ is heat-resistant, but Lumea 9000 is not. That means Bare+ is less prone to overheating or damage from extended sessions.
Withstands high temperatures during extended use.
In the battle of Heat Resistance,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
better than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
higher
4 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Heat Resistance on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Operating Temperature Range
What is the operating temperature range?
48
SmoothSkin Bare+
0Votes
41–104°F
80
Philips Lumea 9000
0Votes
41–104°F
SmoothSkin Bare+
Equivalent to 5–40°C, suitable for most household environments. Avoid using near heat sources.
Philips Lumea 9000
That’s 5–40 °C—use in a normal room-temperature environment.
vs
Score History
Updated at 2025-12-11 05:02:03: 0Updated at 2025-12-23 03:19:23: 82Updated at 2026-04-02 04:58:41: 80
Score info for SmoothSkin Bare+:
We base our scoring on 'Operating Temperature Range' on the following:
Score 80: Moderate range, does not cover below freezing.. Score reduced because release date is older
Safe temperature range for device use.
In the battle of Operating Temperature Range,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
lower
32 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Operating Temperature Range on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Storage Temperature Range
What is the storage temperature range?
73
SmoothSkin Bare+
0Votes
-13–158°F
80
Philips Lumea 9000
0Votes
−13–158°F
SmoothSkin Bare+
Converts to -25–70°C, meaning the device tolerates a wide range of storage conditions—just keep it dry.
Philips Lumea 9000
Equals −25–70 °C; let the unit acclimate ~30 min to ~20 °C before use if stored hot/cold.
vs
Score History
Updated at 2025-12-11 05:02:03: 0Updated at 2025-12-23 03:19:23: 80Updated at 2026-04-02 04:58:41: 82
Score info for SmoothSkin Bare+:
We base our scoring on 'Storage Temperature Range' on the following:
Score 82: Widest temperature range with lowest lower and highest upper limit.. Score reduced because release date is older
Safe temperature range for storing the device.
In the battle of Storage Temperature Range,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
lower
7 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Storage Temperature Range on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Shock Resistance
Is it shock resistant?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
No
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
Withstands accidental drops or impacts.
In the battle of Shock Resistance,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Shock Resistance on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Recyclable Materials
Is it made with recyclable materials?
Yes
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
Yes
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
Uses recyclable or eco-friendly materials.
In the battle of Recyclable Materials,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
lower
7 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Recyclable Materials on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Energy Efficiency Rating
What is the energy efficiency rating?
Who knows?
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Indicates efficiency of power consumption.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Energy Efficiency Rating on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
UV Resistance
Is it UV resistant?
Yes
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
Yes
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
Resistant to UV-related discoloration or damage.
In the battle of UV Resistance,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
lower
4 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
UV Resistance on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Moisture Resistance
Is it moisture resistant?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
No
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
Protects against moisture and humidity.
In the battle of Moisture Resistance,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Moisture Resistance on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Build Quality Rating
What is the build quality rating?
Who knows?
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Score of overall construction quality.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Build Quality Rating on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
SmoothSkin Bare+ includes protective inserts in the packaging, while Lumea 9000 does not. Bare+ arrives more securely packaged, reducing the risk of damage during shipping.
Foam or cardboard inserts to protect device.
In the battle of Protective Inserts,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
better than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
higher
4 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Protective Inserts on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Philips Lumea 9000 provides a carrying case, while Bare+ does not. The inclusion makes Lumea more convenient for organized, portable storage.
Dedicated case inside packaging.
In the battle of Carrying Case Included,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Carrying Case Included on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Philips Lumea 9000 includes a protective pouch, while Bare+ omits it. It’s a small perk that adds travel convenience.
Pouch for storage or travel included.
In the battle of Protective Pouch,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Protective Pouch on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Philips Lumea 9000 comes in eco-friendly packaging, while Bare+ does not. Lumea stands out for sustainability-minded users.
Packaging made from recyclable/eco materials.
In the battle of Eco-friendly Packaging,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Eco-friendly Packaging on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Box Design
What is the box design like?
44
SmoothSkin Bare+
0Votes
Standard
75
Philips Lumea 9000
0Votes
Standard
Philips Lumea 9000
PDP shows “Luxury beauty box.”—content varies by bundle/region.
Description of the packaging style.
In the battle of Box Design,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
lower
31 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Box Design on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
User Manual
Does it include a user manual?
Yes
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
Yes
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
Printed or digital manual included.
In the battle of User Manual,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
lower
7 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
User Manual on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Quick Start Guide
Is a quick start guide included?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
No
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
Step-by-step setup guide for first use.
In the battle of Quick Start Guide,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Quick Start Guide on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Multilingual Manual
Is the manual multilingual?
Yes
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
Yes
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
Manual available in multiple languages.
In the battle of Multilingual Manual,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
lower
9 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Multilingual Manual on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Warranty Card
Is a warranty card included?
Yes
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
Yes
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9000
Physical card or registration form for warranty.
In the battle of Warranty Card,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9000 ◉
, delivering
lower
6 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Warranty Card on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9000 ◉ and help others decide!
Surveys
Because hot takes deserve votes.
Effectiveness
How effective is this IPL & Laser Hair Removal device at reducing hair growth over time?
Excellent results — Over 90% hair reduction after a few sessions
0Votes
0Votes
Good results — Around 75% hair reduction after several sessions
0Votes
0Votes
Moderate results — About 50% hair reduction with regular use
0Votes
0Votes
Minimal results — Less than 30% hair reduction even after consistent use
0Votes
0Votes
No visible results — Almost no change after multiple sessions
0Votes
0Votes
Speed
How fast can this IPL & Laser Hair Removal device complete a full treatment session?
Very fast — Under 10 minutes
0Votes
0Votes
Fast — 10 to 20 minutes
0Votes
0Votes
Average speed — 20 to 30 minutes
0Votes
0Votes
Slow — 30 to 45 minutes
0Votes
0Votes
Very slow — Over 45 minutes
0Votes
0Votes
Comfort
How comfortable is this IPL & Laser Hair Removal device to use on the skin during treatment?
Very comfortable — Gentle with little to no heat sensation
0Votes
0Votes
Comfortable — Mild warmth, easy to tolerate
0Votes
0Votes
Fairly comfortable — Noticeable warmth but manageable
0Votes
0Votes
Slightly uncomfortable — Occasional stinging or heat
0Votes
0Votes
Uncomfortable — Painful or irritating on sensitive skin
0Votes
0Votes
Ease of Setup
How easy is it to set up and operate this IPL & Laser Hair Removal device?
Very easy — Ready to use right out of the box
0Votes
0Votes
Easy — Quick setup with clear instructions
0Votes
0Votes
Moderate — Takes some time to learn
0Votes
0Votes
Complicated — Setup is confusing or takes effort
0Votes
0Votes
Difficult — Hard to set up and operate
0Votes
0Votes
Design
How appealing and well-built is the design of this IPL & Laser Hair Removal device?
Sleek and sturdy — Feels premium and durable
0Votes
0Votes
Modern and solid — Good materials and design
0Votes
0Votes
Decent — Functional but not very stylish
0Votes
0Votes
Basic — Feels light or cheap
0Votes
0Votes
Poor — Flimsy design and low-quality build
0Votes
0Votes
Noise Level
How quiet is this IPL & Laser Hair Removal device during operation?
Whisper quiet — Barely noticeable sound
0Votes
0Votes
Quiet — Low, soft noise
0Votes
0Votes
Moderate — Noticeable hum but not distracting
0Votes
0Votes
Noisy — Loud enough to be annoying
0Votes
0Votes
Very noisy — Disturbing or unpleasant noise level
0Votes
0Votes
Lamp or Cartridge Longevity
How long does the lamp or cartridge of this IPL & Laser Hair Removal device last before replacement?
Very durable — Over 500,000 flashes
0Votes
0Votes
Durable — 300,000 to 500,000 flashes
0Votes
0Votes
Moderate lifespan — 150,000 to 300,000 flashes
0Votes
0Votes
Short lifespan — 50,000 to 150,000 flashes
0Votes
0Votes
Very short lifespan — Under 50,000 flashes
0Votes
0Votes
Skin Tone and Hair Type
How well does this IPL & Laser Hair Removal device work across different skin tones and hair types?
Highly versatile — Works effectively on most tones and hair types
0Votes
0Votes
Broadly compatible — Works well for many users
0Votes
0Votes
Moderate compatibility — Works for common skin and hair types
0Votes
0Votes
Limited — Only suitable for certain tones or hair colors
0Votes
0Votes
Poor — Works for very few users
0Votes
0Votes
Results
How satisfied are users with the consistency of results from this IPL & Laser Hair Removal device?
Very satisfied — Reliable, consistent results every time
0Votes
0Votes
Satisfied — Mostly consistent with minor variations
0Votes
0Votes
Neutral — Mixed results depending on usage
0Votes
0Votes
Dissatisfied — Often inconsistent outcomes
0Votes
0Votes
Very dissatisfied — Rarely produces expected results
0Votes
0Votes
Pricing
How would you rate the pricing of this IPL & Laser Hair Removal device compared to its performance and quality?
Supermod
Moderator
Recaptor
0
Cartling
