Yep, we may get a tiny thank-you (read: commission) when you buy through
links on Auralockr — not enough for a yacht, but enough to keep the lights (and
servers) on.
Learn more
96
Highlights
50
Differences
2
Reactions
0
Likes
SmoothSkin Bare+
vs
Philips Lumea 9900:
96 Highlights & 50 Differences —
So, Which IPL & Laser Hair Removal Device Actually Works Better
Budget-friendly versus feature-heavy—SmoothSkin Bare+ and Philips Lumea 9900 go head-to-head. The final verdict might surprise you.
Still unsure between SmoothSkin Bare+ and Philips Lumea 9900? We compared their power source, chest/back compatibility, fda approval & rohs compliance and features so you can confidently pick the better ipl & laser hair removal device.
SmoothSkin Bare+ vs Philips Lumea 9900: A Deep Dive into Two Powerful IPL Hair Removal Devices
When it comes to IPL hair removal, both the SmoothSkin Bare+ and the Philips Lumea 9900 stand out for their at-home convenience and reliable results. These handheld devices target multiple areas like the face, legs, arms, bikini line, and underarms. While both share a unisex design and offer skin tone sensors for added safety, they differ in performance levels, smart technology integration, and overall power. The SmoothSkin Bare+ is known for its speed and simplicity, while the Philips Lumea 9900 packs advanced smart features, higher energy levels, and cordless flexibility.
At their core, both devices deliver light pulses to weaken hair follicles, helping reduce regrowth over time. Yet, the SmoothSkin Bare+ focuses on efficient speed with a 0.6-second flash rate, while the Philips Lumea 9900 aims for precision with higher adjustable energy intensity levels. Both promise visible results within four weeks, but how they get there—and how comfortable the process feels—differs quite a bit.
The Smooth and Speedy Performer: SmoothSkin Bare+
The SmoothSkin Bare+ is designed for users who value simplicity and speed. With a fast 0.6-second flash speed interval and a lightweight build of just 0.44 lbs, it’s built for efficiency and easy handling. Its single flash level system eliminates guesswork, making it a strong fit for beginners who want fast results without technical fuss. The Bare+ also includes an effective cooling feature that enhances comfort during sessions—a major plus when used on sensitive areas like the bikini line or underarms.
Unlike its rival, it’s a corded device, meaning you won’t have to worry about battery drain mid-session. Its compact form and ergonomic shape allow for quick, one-handed operation, completing full-body treatments in as little as ten minutes. While it lacks smart features like app connectivity or AI-based skin analysis, it makes up for it with simplicity and consistent energy output.
On the performance front, the 4 J/cm² energy density combined with a 12 Joule max energy per flash ensures effective hair reduction. Additionally, its FDA approval and CE certification add credibility to its consumer-grade safety standards. For a device priced around $109 at Amazon, the SmoothSkin Bare+ offers remarkable performance per dollar, especially for anyone looking to start IPL hair removal without overinvesting.
Smart Precision and Premium Design: Philips Lumea 9900
The Philips Lumea 9900 takes the premium route, appealing to users who want smarter functionality and more customization. It features five adjustable flash levels, giving you greater control over treatment intensity. The inclusion of a skin tone sensor and smart app connectivity adds a layer of personalization that helps optimize results for different skin tones and hair types. Beyond power, the Lumea’s ability to sync with an app for progress tracking and treatment reminders brings modern convenience to beauty tech.
One of the biggest perks of the Philips model is its dual power design. It can operate both corded and cordless thanks to its Li-ion battery, allowing mobility without compromising performance. Its 6.5 J/cm² energy density makes it one of the most powerful IPL devices for home use, capable of deeper follicle penetration for longer-lasting results. And with 450,000 flashes per lamp lifespan, it promises years of use before any maintenance is required.
Design-wise, it’s slightly heavier but more ergonomic, featuring a pistol-grip handle and multiple attachments for targeted treatments on the face, body, bikini, and underarms. Users will also appreciate the inclusion of a travel pouch, storage case, and quick-start guide, all signs of its premium positioning. It’s an advanced, thoughtfully designed tool—albeit one that comes at a much higher cost of $720.26 at Philips.co.uk.
Quick Take
The SmoothSkin Bare+ wins on speed, affordability, and beginner-friendly operation. Its cooling system and fan-based design make it more comfortable for longer sessions. The Philips Lumea 9900, on the other hand, is a clear winner for tech enthusiasts who want a customizable, cordless IPL device with multiple attachments and smart tracking. Both deliver salon-quality results, but they cater to very different audiences.
Closing Recommendation
Both devices are capable of achieving smooth, hair-free skin, but your choice depends on what you value most. If you prefer a straightforward, reliable, and affordable IPL solution, the SmoothSkin Bare+ delivers fantastic value without compromising on effectiveness. However, if you’re seeking advanced performance, adjustable settings, and intelligent connectivity, the Philips Lumea 9900 is the smarter, albeit more expensive, investment.
Overall, for first-time users or those on a budget, the SmoothSkin Bare+ remains the practical pick. For beauty enthusiasts who want cutting-edge precision and flexibility, the Philips Lumea 9900 justifies its premium tag with advanced features and excellent long-term usability.
Verdict
Winner: Philips Lumea 9900 – Offers superior energy density, cordless convenience, and smart connectivity for a high-end experience.
Runner-up: SmoothSkin Bare+ – Delivers fast, effective results at a fraction of the price, perfect for simple, efficient at-home use.
Side by side. The numbers. The features. No drama.
Trying to choose between SmoothSkin Bare+ and Philips Lumea 9900? This versus breakdown covers everything — specs, pros and cons, pricing, what users like (and don’t), and which ipl & laser hair removal device makes more sense for your needs and budget.
The SmoothSkin Bare+ debuted in 2020, while the Philips Lumea 9900 arrived in 2024, making the Philips model four years newer. The newer release means upgraded technology and refined features that improve comfort and customization for modern users.
Indicates when the model was released.
In the battle of Release Year,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
, delivering
lower
39 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Release Year on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Warranty Period
What is the warranty period?
2
years
0Votes
2
years
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
Standard coverage against manufacturing faults. Extendable via SmoothSkin registration.
Philips Lumea 9900
Standard 2-year global warranty, extendable to 5 years total with registration on Philips.com.
Length of warranty coverage provided by manufacturer.
In the battle of Warranty Period,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
, delivering
equal
2.00 years
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Warranty Period on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Model Name
What is the model name?
74
SmoothSkin Bare+
0Votes
Bare+
92
Philips Lumea 9900
0Votes
Philips Lumea IPL 9900
Identifies the product for recognition and comparison.
In the battle of Model Name,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
, delivering
lower
18 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Model Name on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Device Type
What type of device is it?
54
SmoothSkin Bare+
0Votes
Handheld
90
Philips Lumea 9900
0Votes
Handheld
Defines whether the device is handheld or desktop style.
In the battle of Device Type,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
, delivering
lower
36 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Device Type on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
91
Philips Lumea 9900
0Votes
Face, Legs, Arms, Bikini, Underarms
Indicates which body areas the device is suitable for.
In the battle of Target Area,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
, delivering
lower
13 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Target Area on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Intended Use
Is it for home or professional use?
34
SmoothSkin Bare+
0Votes
At-home
90
Philips Lumea 9900
0Votes
At-home
Shows if intended for consumers, professionals, or dual use.
In the battle of Intended Use,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
, delivering
lower
56 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Intended Use on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Gender Suitability
Who is the device suitable for?
94
SmoothSkin Bare+
0Votes
Unisex
90
Philips Lumea 9900
0Votes
Unisex
Specifies if the device is marketed for men, women, or both.
In the battle of Gender Suitability,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
better than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
, delivering
higher
4 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Gender Suitability on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Skin Tone Compatibility
What skin tones are compatible?
47
SmoothSkin Bare+
0Votes
Light, Medium, Dark
91
Philips Lumea 9900
0Votes
Light, Medium, Brown, Dark
Shows which skin tones are supported.
In the battle of Skin Tone Compatibility,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
, delivering
lower
44 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Skin Tone Compatibility on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Hair Color Compatibility
Which hair colors does it work on?
82
SmoothSkin Bare+
0Votes
Black, Brown
89
Philips Lumea 9900
0Votes
Black, Brown, Dark Blonde
vs
Score History
Updated at 2025-12-11 05:02:03: 0Updated at 2025-12-23 03:19:23: 87Updated at 2026-04-02 04:58:41: 88
Score info for SmoothSkin Bare+:
We base our scoring on 'Hair Color Compatibility' on the following:
Score 88: Common effective hair color for IPL, indicating advanced capability. | Effective for IPL, closely related to high effectiveness range.. Score reduced because release date is older
Defines what hair colors the IPL is effective on.
In the battle of Hair Color Compatibility,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
, delivering
lower
7 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Hair Color Compatibility on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Usage Environment
Where can the device be used?
94
SmoothSkin Bare+
0Votes
Indoor
88
Philips Lumea 9900
0Votes
Indoor
Indicates whether the device is suitable for home use, professional salons, or both.
In the battle of Usage Environment,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
better than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
, delivering
higher
6 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Usage Environment on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Portability
Is the device portable?
Yes
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
Yes
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
Whether the device can be easily carried/travel-friendly.
In the battle of Portability,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
, delivering
lower
9 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Portability on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Country of Origin
What is the country of origin?
74
SmoothSkin Bare+
0Votes
UK
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Tells where the product was originally manufactured/designed.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Country of Origin on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Dimensions & Weight
11
Width
What is the device width?
2.95
inch
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
SmoothSkin Bare+
Converts to about 7.5 cm, giving it a narrow grip suited for small treatment areas.
The overall width of the device body.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Width on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Depth
What is the device depth?
1.77
inch
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
SmoothSkin Bare+
Equivalent to about 4.5 cm, showing the SmoothSkin Bare+ has a compact, handheld profile easy to maneuver.
The overall depth (front to back) of the device.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Depth on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Height
What is the device height?
5.12
inch
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
SmoothSkin Bare+
Roughly 13 cm tall, similar to the length of a standard smartphone—fits easily in one hand.
The overall height of the device.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Height on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Weight
What is the device weight?
0.44
lbs
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
SmoothSkin Bare+
About 0.2 kg, comparable to a compact electric shaver—easy to handle for longer sessions.
The overall weight of the device.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Weight on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Package Width
What is the package width?
Who knows?
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
10.4
inch
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
Equivalent to about 26.4 cm, roughly the width of a compact shoebox—easy to store in drawers or shelves.
Width of the product packaging.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Package Width on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Package Depth
What is the package depth?
Who knows?
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
4.72
inch
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
Around 12 cm deep, compact enough for travel or bathroom storage.
Depth of the product packaging.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Package Depth on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Package Height
What is the package height?
Who knows?
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
10
inch
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
Equals about 25.4 cm, similar to the height of a medium-sized tablet in portrait mode.
Height of the product packaging.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Package Height on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Package Weight
What is the package weight?
Who knows?
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
2.64
lbs
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
Roughly 1.2 kg, light enough to carry one-handed when traveling.
Indicates how heavy the packaged device is, important for portability and shipping.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Package Weight on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Folded Width
What is the folded width?
Who knows?
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Width when device is folded (if applicable).
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Folded Width on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Folded Depth
What is the folded depth?
Who knows?
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Depth when device is folded (if applicable).
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Folded Depth on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Folded Height
What is the folded height?
Who knows?
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Height when device is folded (if applicable).
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Folded Height on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
SmoothSkin Bare+ is strictly corded, requiring a constant power connection, while the Philips Lumea 9900 can run corded or cordless. The cordless option offers more flexibility for treating hard-to-reach areas without worrying about cable length.
vs
Score History
Updated at 2025-12-11 05:02:03: 0Updated at 2025-12-23 03:19:23: 88Updated at 2026-04-02 04:58:41: 87
Score info for SmoothSkin Bare+:
We base our scoring on 'Power Source' on the following:
Score 87: Provides continuous power via cord, basic but reliable power source.. Score reduced because release date is older
Defines how the device is powered.
In the battle of Power Source,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
, delivering
lower
48 score
measurement.
Based on community votes for Power Source,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ earned
0 votes,
less than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉,
which got 1 votes.
I actually prefer the cordless setup on the Philips Lumea 9900. Being able to move around without a cable tugging is a total game changer during longer IPL sessions.
The SmoothSkin Bare+ draws just 10 watts, while the Philips Lumea 9900 consumes up to 65 watts. Higher wattage allows Philips to deliver stronger flashes and faster charging but may slightly increase power usage during extended treatments.
Electrical power used during operation.
In the battle of Power Consumption,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
better than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
, delivering
lower
55.0 Watt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Consumption on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
SmoothSkin Bare+ delivers 4 J/cm², while Philips Lumea 9900 outputs 6.5 J/cm². The higher energy density of Philips provides deeper follicle impact for longer-lasting results, especially on dense or coarse hair types.
Energy delivered per square centimeter during each flash.
In the battle of Energy Density,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
, delivering
lower
2.5 J/cm²
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Energy Density on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
With a 1 ms pulse duration, the Bare+ emits short, quick flashes, whereas the Lumea 9900 stretches it to 2.5 ms for deeper follicle penetration. Longer pulses generally enhance hair reduction efficiency on thicker hair.
Length of each flash pulse.
In the battle of Pulse Duration,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
, delivering
lower
1.5 ms
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Pulse Duration on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
SmoothSkin Bare+ fires every 0.6 seconds, much faster than Philips Lumea 9900’s 3.5-second interval. This makes Bare+ ideal for users who want full-body treatments done quickly with minimal waiting time.
Time between flashes during treatment.
In the battle of Flash Speed Interval,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
better than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
, delivering
lower
2.9 sec
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Flash Speed Interval on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
The Philips Lumea 9900’s treatment window measures 0.64 square inches (about 4.13 cm²), slightly larger than SmoothSkin Bare+ at 0.46 square inches (2.97 cm²). A larger window covers more skin per flash, speeding up each session.
The surface area of the flash window.
In the battle of Treatment Window Size,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
, delivering
lower
0.2 inch²
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Treatment Window Size on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
The Bare+ offers a single preset flash level, while the Lumea 9900 provides five adjustable intensity levels. This gives Philips users more control to match skin sensitivity and hair thickness for customized treatments.
Number of adjustable intensity levels.
In the battle of Number of Flash Levels,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
, delivering
lower
89 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Number of Flash Levels on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Philips Lumea 9900 supports an automatic mode that adjusts power for convenience, while the Bare+ lacks this feature. Auto mode reduces manual adjustments, helping users achieve more consistent results across different body areas.
Automates treatment settings for ease of use.
In the battle of Auto Mode,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Auto Mode on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Input Voltage
What is the input voltage?
84
SmoothSkin Bare+
0Votes
100–240V
90
Philips Lumea 9900
0Votes
100–240V
SmoothSkin Bare+
Universal voltage works worldwide with plug adapters—great for travelers.
Philips Lumea 9900
Universal voltage; safe to use worldwide with regional plug adapter if needed.
The voltage required for operation.
In the battle of Input Voltage,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
, delivering
lower
6 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Input Voltage on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Visible Results Timeframe
How soon are visible results expected?
4
weeks
0Votes
4
weeks
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
Users typically notice reduced regrowth after about one month of consistent weekly treatments.
Philips Lumea 9900
Typically visible after 2–3 treatments (about 4–6 weeks) according to Philips’ testing results.
Indicates how soon users can expect to see visible hair reduction after starting treatment. Shorter timeframes are better for faster results.
In the battle of Visible Results Timeframe,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
, delivering
equal
4.00 weeks
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Visible Results Timeframe on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Energy Level Intensity Range
What is the intensity range?
Who knows?
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
90
Philips Lumea 9900
0Votes
1–5 Levels
Philips Lumea 9900
Offers five adjustable settings so users can tailor light intensity to comfort and skin tone.
Range of selectable energy levels.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Energy Level Intensity Range on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Max Energy per Flash
What is the max energy per flash?
12
Joule
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
SmoothSkin Bare+
It's estimated from treatment window size x energy density (4 J/cm² x 3 cm² = 12 J)
Maximum light energy delivered per pulse.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Max Energy per Flash on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Single Flash Mode
Does it support single flash mode?
Yes
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
Yes
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
Philips Lumea 9900
“Stamp & Flash” mode is perfect for precision areas like the face or bikini line.
Allows single, controlled flash for precision.
In the battle of Single Flash Mode,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
, delivering
lower
10 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Single Flash Mode on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Continuous Flash Mode
Does it support continuous flash mode?
Yes
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
Yes
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
Philips Lumea 9900
The “Slide & Flash” mode lets you glide over large areas like legs without pausing between flashes.
Whether the device supports automatic flash sequences.
In the battle of Continuous Flash Mode,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
, delivering
lower
10 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Continuous Flash Mode on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Cooling Mechanism
What cooling mechanism is used?
24
SmoothSkin Bare+
0Votes
Fan-based
88
Philips Lumea 9900
0Votes
Fan-based
Philips Lumea 9900
Internal air-cooling system prevents overheating during continuous use.
Describes cooling system during treatment.
In the battle of Cooling Mechanism,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
, delivering
lower
64 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cooling Mechanism on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Hair Reduction Efficiency
What is the hair reduction efficiency?
44
%
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
SmoothSkin Bare+
The clinical results report 43.9% at 6 months (and 36% at 12 months).
Percentage of hair reduction achieved after a full treatment cycle. Higher values indicate more effective performance.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Hair Reduction Efficiency on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Effective Energy at Follicle
What is the effective energy at the follicle?
4
J/cm²
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Indicates the actual energy reaching the hair follicle, which impacts how effectively the follicle is disabled.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Effective Energy at Follicle on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Manual Mode
Does it have manual mode?
Yes
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
Yes
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
Allows manual adjustment of all settings.
In the battle of Manual Mode,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
, delivering
lower
9 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Manual Mode on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
The Bare+ includes an active cooling feature to reduce skin discomfort, while Philips Lumea 9900 omits it. This gives SmoothSkin an edge for users prone to sensitivity or warmth during IPL sessions.
Provides cooling to reduce discomfort during use.
In the battle of Cooling Feature,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
better than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
, delivering
higher
4 score
measurement.
Based on community votes for Cooling Feature,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ earned
1 votes,
more than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉,
which got 0 votes.
The built-in cooling on the SmoothSkin Bare+ makes a big difference. It keeps the skin calm even after a few minutes of flashing, which is great if you have sensitive spots.
The SmoothSkin Bare+ emits light at 1100 nm, compared to 1400 nm on the Philips Lumea 9900. The higher wavelength in Philips allows for safer operation on darker skin tones by minimizing surface heat absorption.
Indicates the laser wavelength which defines skin and hair compatibility.
In the battle of Wavelength,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
, delivering
lower
300.0 nm
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Wavelength on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Philips Lumea 9900 connects to a smartphone app for treatment guidance and progress tracking, whereas SmoothSkin Bare+ has no app features. The app integration helps maintain consistent schedules and enhances long-term hair reduction planning.
Connects to smartphone app for tracking or guidance.
In the battle of App Connectivity,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
App Connectivity on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Philips Lumea 9900’s AI skin analysis reads tone variations to adapt flash intensity, something SmoothSkin Bare+ doesn’t do. This makes the Philips model better suited for users with mixed or uneven skin tones.
Uses AI to analyze skin and adjust settings.
In the battle of AI Skin Analysis,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
AI Skin Analysis on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
SmoothSkin Bare+ uses an optical sensor, while the Philips Lumea 9900 combines optical and smart sensors. The hybrid setup improves detection accuracy, automatically optimizing flash intensity for safe and effective use.
Identifies the kind of sensor used in the device.
In the battle of Sensor Type,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
, delivering
lower
32 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Sensor Type on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
SmoothSkin Bare+ has an automatic shut-off for safety, but Philips Lumea 9900 lacks it. Auto shut-off prevents overheating and accidental flashes, making the Bare+ more reassuring for beginners.
Shuts down automatically when idle for safety.
In the battle of Auto Shut-off,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
better than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
, delivering
higher
6 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Auto Shut-off on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Philips Lumea 9900 offers manual intensity adjustment with five settings, while the Bare+ operates at a fixed level. Adjustable intensity provides more tailored comfort and effectiveness for different skin areas.
Lets user adjust intensity levels.
In the battle of Intensity Adjustment,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Intensity Adjustment on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Smart guidance in the Philips Lumea 9900 offers on-screen cues through its companion app, while the Bare+ has no similar technology. This feature simplifies operation and ensures correct usage even for first-time IPL users.
Offers intelligent usage guidance to the user.
In the battle of Smart Guidance,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Smart Guidance on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Philips Lumea 9900 includes a built-in tracker through its app to log sessions and monitor progress, while the Bare+ lacks this function. This helps users stay consistent and evaluate results more precisely over time.
Tracks and displays treatment sessions over time.
In the battle of Treatment Progress Tracker,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Treatment Progress Tracker on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
SmoothSkin Bare+ includes a manual safety mode selector, while Philips Lumea 9900 does not. This feature provides an extra layer of control for sensitive users seeking added safety during treatment.
In the battle of Safety Mode Selection,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
better than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
, delivering
higher
6 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Safety Mode Selection on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Skin Tone Sensor
Does it have a skin tone sensor?
Yes
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
Yes
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
SmoothSkin Bare+
Automatically prevents flashing on skin tones too dark for safe IPL treatment—adds an extra layer of safety.
Philips Lumea 9900
SmartSkin sensor automatically adjusts light intensity to suit your skin safely.
Detects if skin tone is safe before flashing.
In the battle of Skin Tone Sensor,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
, delivering
lower
10 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Skin Tone Sensor on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Contact Sensor
Does it include a contact sensor?
Yes
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
Yes
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
SmoothSkin Bare+
Ensures the device only activates when pressed against skin, preventing accidental flashes.
Philips Lumea 9900
Built-in safety system ensures the device only flashes when in full contact with skin.
Ensures device only flashes when in contact with skin.
In the battle of Contact Sensor,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
, delivering
lower
10 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Contact Sensor on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
UV Filter
Does it have a UV filter?
Yes
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
Yes
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
SmoothSkin Bare+
Built-in UV filter shields skin from harmful ultraviolet wavelengths during each flash.
Philips Lumea 9900
Integrated UV filter shields the skin from harmful ultraviolet light.
Blocks harmful UV light for safe treatment.
In the battle of UV Filter,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
, delivering
lower
13 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
UV Filter on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Cooling System Type
What type of cooling system does it use?
64
SmoothSkin Bare+
0Votes
Air Cooling
92
Philips Lumea 9900
0Votes
Air Cooling
SmoothSkin Bare+
The built-in fan helps prevent overheating during use, keeping treatments comfortable without the need for gels.
Philips Lumea 9900
Air circulation system maintains device temperature—quieter and lighter than contact-cooling IPLs.
Describes the type of cooling technology used to minimize skin discomfort during treatment.
In the battle of Cooling System Type,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
, delivering
lower
28 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cooling System Type on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
IPL Technology Type
What IPL technology type is used?
8
SmoothSkin Bare+
0Votes
Standard IPL
87
Philips Lumea 9900
0Votes
Standard IPL
Defines the light pulse technology used.
In the battle of IPL Technology Type,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
, delivering
lower
79 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
IPL Technology Type on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Dual Light Technology
Does it feature dual light technology?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
No
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
Indicates if the device combines two types of light sources (e.g., IPL + RF) for enhanced effectiveness.
In the battle of Dual Light Technology,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Dual Light Technology on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Integrated Safety Glasses
Does it have integrated safety glasses?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
No
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
Built-in protection for the eyes.
In the battle of Integrated Safety Glasses,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Integrated Safety Glasses on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Treatment Timer
Does it include a treatment timer?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
No
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
Tracks treatment time automatically.
In the battle of Treatment Timer,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Treatment Timer on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Replaceable Lamp Cartridge
Is the lamp cartridge replaceable?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
No
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
Allows replacing the lamp for longer use.
In the battle of Replaceable Lamp Cartridge,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Replaceable Lamp Cartridge on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Display Type
What type of display does it have?
0
SmoothSkin Bare+
0Votes
None
85
Philips Lumea 9900
0Votes
None
Shows what type of display is used.
In the battle of Display Type,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
, delivering
lower
85 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Display Type on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Voice Assistance
Does it have voice assistance?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
No
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
Provides voice prompts for operation.
In the battle of Voice Assistance,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Voice Assistance on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Firmware Upgrade Support
Does it support firmware upgrades?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
No
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
Device software can be updated.
In the battle of Firmware Upgrade Support,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Firmware Upgrade Support on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Customizable Programs
Does it support customizable programs?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
No
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
Allows user to create custom treatment modes.
In the battle of Customizable Programs,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Customizable Programs on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
89
Philips Lumea 9900
0Votes
450,000 Flashes
vs
Lamp Longevity
Philips Lumea 9900 is rated for 450,000 flashes, while Bare+ provides no specified flash count. The Philips lamp lifespan supports years of regular use before requiring replacement, making it more cost-efficient long-term.
Total number of flashes supported before lamp wears out.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Lamp Longevity on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
The Bare+ lamp operates within 510–1100 nm, while the Philips Lumea 9900 covers 565–1400 nm. The broader range of Philips targets more hair colors and depths, improving overall coverage and treatment flexibility.
vs
Score History
Updated at 2025-12-11 05:02:04: 0Updated at 2025-12-16 03:47:40: 82Updated at 2025-12-23 03:19:23: 80Updated at 2026-04-02 04:58:41: 82
Score info for SmoothSkin Bare+:
We base our scoring on 'Lamp Color Spectrum' on the following:
Score 82: Intermediate bandwidth, slightly narrower upper range.. Score reduced because release date is older
Range of wavelengths emitted by the lamp.
In the battle of Lamp Color Spectrum,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
, delivering
lower
38 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Lamp Color Spectrum on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Lamp Type
What type of lamp is used?
64
SmoothSkin Bare+
0Votes
Xenon
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Identifies the technology used for the flash lamp.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Lamp Type on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Replaceable Lamp
Is the lamp replaceable?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
No
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
Whether the lamp can be replaced by the user.
In the battle of Replaceable Lamp,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Replaceable Lamp on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Lamp Change Indicator
Does it have a lamp change indicator?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
No
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
Alerts user when lamp needs replacement.
In the battle of Lamp Change Indicator,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Lamp Change Indicator on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Lamp Lifetime Indicator
Does it show lamp lifetime?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
No
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
Displays remaining flash count or lamp life.
In the battle of Lamp Lifetime Indicator,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Lamp Lifetime Indicator on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Pre-flash Cooling
Does it include pre-flash cooling?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
No
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
Provides cooling before each flash for comfort.
In the battle of Pre-flash Cooling,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Pre-flash Cooling on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Cartridge Compatibility
What cartridges are compatible?
Who knows?
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Indicates which cartridges are compatible with the device.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cartridge Compatibility on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Lamp Material
What material is the lamp made of?
58
SmoothSkin Bare+
0Votes
Glass
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs
Score History
Updated at 2025-12-11 05:02:04: 0Updated at 2025-12-16 03:47:40: 84Updated at 2025-12-23 03:19:23: 82Updated at 2026-04-02 04:58:41: 80
Score info for SmoothSkin Bare+:
We base our scoring on 'Lamp Material' on the following:
Score 80: Glass is a basic, common lamp material but less advanced than quartz.. Score reduced because release date is older
Material composition of the lamp (e.g., quartz glass).
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Lamp Material on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
SmoothSkin Bare+ supports chest and back use, while Philips Lumea 9900 does not. This gives Bare+ broader usability, especially for men or users targeting larger body areas.
Safe for use on chest and back hair.
In the battle of Chest/Back Compatibility,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
better than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
, delivering
higher
4 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Chest/Back Compatibility on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Skin Tone Range Supported
What skin tones are supported?
47
SmoothSkin Bare+
0Votes
Light, Medium, Dark
91
Philips Lumea 9900
0Votes
Light, Medium, Brown, Dark
vs
Score History
Updated at 2025-12-11 05:02:04: 0Updated at 2025-12-16 03:47:40: 88Updated at 2025-12-23 03:19:23: 85Updated at 2026-04-02 04:58:41: 88
Score info for SmoothSkin Bare+:
We base our scoring on 'Skin Tone Range Supported' on the following:
Score 88: Represents a basic and limited range for skin tones. | Indicates an expanded but still common skin tone category. | Covers the darkest skin tone range, showing full inclusion within the list.. Score reduced because release date is older
Defines the full range of skin tones supported.
In the battle of Skin Tone Range Supported,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
, delivering
lower
44 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Skin Tone Range Supported on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Hair Color Range Supported
What hair colors are supported?
89
SmoothSkin Bare+
0Votes
Black, Brown
91
Philips Lumea 9900
0Votes
Black, Brown, Dark Blonde
Defines the hair colors that respond well to IPL.
In the battle of Hair Color Range Supported,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Hair Color Range Supported on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Fitzpatrick Scale Compatibility
Which Fitzpatrick types are compatible?
42
SmoothSkin Bare+
0Votes
I, II, III, IV, V
90
Philips Lumea 9900
0Votes
I, II, III, IV, V
Identifies the Fitzpatrick skin types safe for use.
In the battle of Fitzpatrick Scale Compatibility,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
, delivering
lower
48 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Fitzpatrick Scale Compatibility on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Sensitive Skin Mode
Does it have sensitive skin mode?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
No
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
Provides gentler settings for sensitive skin.
In the battle of Sensitive Skin Mode,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Sensitive Skin Mode on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Facial Hair Compatibility
Is it compatible with facial hair?
Yes
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
Yes
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
Safe and effective for facial hair use.
In the battle of Facial Hair Compatibility,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
, delivering
lower
12 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Facial Hair Compatibility on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Body Hair Compatibility
Is it compatible with body hair?
Yes
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
Yes
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
Designed for larger body areas like arms and legs.
In the battle of Body Hair Compatibility,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
, delivering
lower
10 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Body Hair Compatibility on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Bikini Line Compatibility
Is it safe for bikini line?
Yes
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
Yes
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
Safe for sensitive bikini area treatment.
In the battle of Bikini Line Compatibility,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
, delivering
lower
9 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Bikini Line Compatibility on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Underarm Compatibility
Can it be used on underarms?
Yes
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
Yes
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
Effective and safe for underarm area.
In the battle of Underarm Compatibility,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
, delivering
lower
9 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Underarm Compatibility on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Leg Compatibility
Is it compatible with leg hair?
Yes
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
Yes
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
Suitable for use on legs.
In the battle of Leg Compatibility,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
, delivering
lower
9 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Leg Compatibility on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Beard Compatibility
Is it safe for beard use?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
No
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
Determines if device can be used on beard hair.
In the battle of Beard Compatibility,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Beard Compatibility on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Tattoo Area Safety
Is it safe around tattoos?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
No
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
Ensures safe avoidance of tattooed skin areas.
In the battle of Tattoo Area Safety,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
better than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Tattoo Area Safety on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
SmoothSkin Bare+ is FDA-approved, while Philips Lumea 9900 isn’t. FDA approval offers added confidence for U.S. buyers seeking proven safety and consumer protection standards.
Confirms approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
In the battle of FDA Approval,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
better than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
, delivering
higher
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
FDA Approval on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
SmoothSkin Bare+ meets RoHS compliance for environmental safety, while Philips Lumea 9900 does not list compliance. This makes Bare+ slightly more eco-conscious for users mindful of material restrictions.
Confirms restriction of hazardous substances.
In the battle of RoHS Compliance,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
better than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
, delivering
higher
6 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
RoHS Compliance on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
The Bare+ holds IEC certification while the Philips model lacks it. This confirms the SmoothSkin device meets international electrical safety standards for home-use beauty electronics.
Compliance with International Electrotechnical Commission standards.
In the battle of IEC Safety Certification,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
better than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
, delivering
higher
6 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
IEC Safety Certification on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
CE Certification
Does it have CE certification?
Yes
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
Yes
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
SmoothSkin Bare+
Conforms to European safety and electromagnetic standards (Low Voltage & EMC directives).
Philips Lumea 9900
Complies with EU health, safety, and environmental protection standards.
Indicates compliance with European safety standards.
In the battle of CE Certification,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
, delivering
lower
13 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
CE Certification on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Automatic Skin Detection
Does it have automatic skin detection?
Yes
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
Yes
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
Detects skin before flashing to prevent misuse.
In the battle of Automatic Skin Detection,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
, delivering
lower
10 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Automatic Skin Detection on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Overheat Protection
Does it have overheat protection?
Yes
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
Yes
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
Prevents overheating during long use.
In the battle of Overheat Protection,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
, delivering
lower
13 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Overheat Protection on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Eye Safety Protection
Does it have eye safety protection?
Yes
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
Yes
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
Ensures flashes are safe for eyes with built-in shielding.
In the battle of Eye Safety Protection,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
, delivering
lower
13 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Eye Safety Protection on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Contact Safety Lock
Does it include a contact safety lock?
Yes
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
Yes
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
Device locks unless in contact with skin.
In the battle of Contact Safety Lock,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
, delivering
lower
13 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Contact Safety Lock on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Child Safety Lock
Does it include a child safety lock?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
No
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
Prevents accidental activation by children.
In the battle of Child Safety Lock,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Child Safety Lock on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Medical Grade Classification
What is the device classification?
34
SmoothSkin Bare+
0Votes
Consumer
88
Philips Lumea 9900
0Votes
Consumer
vs
Score History
Updated at 2025-12-11 05:02:04: 0Updated at 2025-12-16 03:47:40: 75Updated at 2025-12-23 03:19:23: 80Updated at 2026-04-02 04:58:41: 75
Score info for SmoothSkin Bare+:
We base our scoring on 'Medical Grade Classification' on the following:
Score 75: Typically represents basic, less regulated classification.. Score reduced because release date is older
Indicates if classified as consumer or medical-grade.
In the battle of Medical Grade Classification,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
, delivering
lower
54 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Medical Grade Classification on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
SmoothSkin Bare+ completes full treatments in roughly 10 minutes, whereas Philips Lumea 9900 takes around 8.5 minutes. The Philips model is marginally faster overall, making it better for quick routine sessions.
Time per flash or per treatment cycle.
In the battle of Treatment Speed,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
, delivering
higher
1.5 minutes
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Treatment Speed on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
SmoothSkin Bare+ features a straight handle, while the Philips Lumea 9900 uses a pistol-grip design. The pistol grip offers a more natural angle for larger areas, while the straight handle aids compact precision work.
Defines how the handle is shaped for comfort.
In the battle of Handle Design,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
, delivering
lower
63 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Handle Design on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
SmoothSkin Bare+ has quick cooling recovery between flashes, but Philips Lumea 9900 does not. Faster recovery allows continuous use with less heat buildup, improving comfort during long treatments.
Returns to optimal cooling faster between flashes.
In the battle of Quick Cooling Recovery,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
better than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
, delivering
higher
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Quick Cooling Recovery on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Ergonomic Design
Does it have an ergonomic design?
Yes
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
Yes
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
SmoothSkin Bare+
Designed for one-handed operation with a smooth curved profile that minimizes wrist strain.
Ensures comfortable grip and handling during long sessions.
In the battle of Ergonomic Design,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
, delivering
lower
7 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Ergonomic Design on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Ease of Cleaning
How easy is it to clean?
0
SmoothSkin Bare+
0Votes
Easy
87
Philips Lumea 9900
0Votes
Easy
SmoothSkin Bare+
Simply wipe with a dry, lint-free cloth; no water or cleaning fluids needed.
Describes how simple it is to maintain and clean the device.
In the battle of Ease of Cleaning,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
, delivering
lower
87 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Ease of Cleaning on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Recommended Usage Frequency
What is the recommended usage frequency?
1
times/week
0Votes
1
times/week
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
Philips recommends every 2 weeks during the initial 4 sessions, then monthly touch-ups—so about 0.5×/week on average.
Specifies how often the device should be used per week for optimal results. Lower frequency indicates greater efficiency.
In the battle of Recommended Usage Frequency,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
, delivering
equal
1.00 times/week
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Recommended Usage Frequency on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Grip Texture
What type of grip texture does it have?
4
SmoothSkin Bare+
0Votes
Smooth
85
Philips Lumea 9900
0Votes
Smooth
Indicates grip style for secure handling.
In the battle of Grip Texture,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
, delivering
lower
81 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Grip Texture on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Ergonomic Angle Head
Does it have an ergonomic angle head?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
No
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
Head angled for better access to body contours.
In the battle of Ergonomic Angle Head,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Ergonomic Angle Head on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Adjustable Head Rotation
Does it support adjustable head rotation?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
No
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
Flash head can rotate to adjust treatment angle.
In the battle of Adjustable Head Rotation,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Adjustable Head Rotation on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Button Placement
Where are the buttons placed?
64
SmoothSkin Bare+
0Votes
Top
88
Philips Lumea 9900
0Votes
Top
vs
Score History
Updated at 2025-12-11 05:02:04: 0Updated at 2025-12-23 03:19:23: 88Updated at 2026-04-02 04:58:41: 85
Score info for SmoothSkin Bare+:
We base our scoring on 'Button Placement' on the following:
Score 85: Top placement is common but less ergonomic and less advanced compared to side placement.. Score reduced because release date is older
Location of main buttons for ease of control.
In the battle of Button Placement,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
, delivering
lower
24 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Button Placement on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Replaceable Cover Design
Does it have a replaceable cover design?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
No
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
Allows cover replacement for hygiene or customization.
In the battle of Replaceable Cover Design,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Replaceable Cover Design on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Cooling Sensation Level
What is the cooling sensation level?
Who knows?
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Measures how much skin cooling is delivered for comfort.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cooling Sensation Level on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Pain Reduction Technology
Does it include pain reduction technology?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
No
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
Uses advanced tech to reduce discomfort from flashes.
In the battle of Pain Reduction Technology,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Pain Reduction Technology on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Pain Level Rating
What is the pain level rating?
Who knows?
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
User-reported pain level score.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Pain Level Rating on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Comfort Mode
Does it have a comfort mode?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
No
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
Special operation setting for gentler sessions.
In the battle of Comfort Mode,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Comfort Mode on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Auto Energy Adjustment
Does it have auto energy adjustment?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
No
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
Adjusts intensity automatically based on skin type.
In the battle of Auto Energy Adjustment,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Auto Energy Adjustment on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Vibration Level
What is the vibration level?
Who knows?
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Measures vibration strength to ensure comfort.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Vibration Level on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Vibration Feedback
Does it have vibration feedback?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
No
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
Gives haptic feedback when buttons are pressed or flash is ready.
In the battle of Vibration Feedback,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Vibration Feedback on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Indicator Lights
Does it have indicator lights?
Yes
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
Yes
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
Provides clear LED/light indicators for status.
In the battle of Indicator Lights,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
, delivering
lower
7 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Indicator Lights on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Treatment Area Preview
Does it have a treatment area preview?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
No
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
Displays or projects the area to be treated before flashing.
In the battle of Treatment Area Preview,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Treatment Area Preview on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Ease of Use Rating
What is the ease of use rating?
Who knows?
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Score reflecting overall usability.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Ease of Use Rating on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Cleaning Method
What is the cleaning method?
54
SmoothSkin Bare+
0Votes
Wipe
90
Philips Lumea 9900
0Votes
Wipe
Type of cleaning method supported.
In the battle of Cleaning Method,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
, delivering
lower
36 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cleaning Method on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
One-hand Operation
Can it be operated with one hand?
Yes
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
Yes
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
Device can be comfortably operated with one hand.
In the battle of One-hand Operation,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
, delivering
lower
9 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
One-hand Operation on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Cordless Operation
Can it operate cordless?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
Yes
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
Device can be used wirelessly without power cord.
In the battle of Cordless Operation,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cordless Operation on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Cord Length
What is the cord length?
Who knows?
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Measures cable length for ease of movement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cord Length on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Lightweight Rating
What is the lightweight rating?
Who knows?
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Indicates weight level for easy handling.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Lightweight Rating on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Travel Lock
Does it have a travel lock?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
No
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
Prevents device from turning on accidentally during travel.
In the battle of Travel Lock,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Travel Lock on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Noise Level
What is the noise level?
Who knows?
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Indicates loudness of device during operation.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Noise Level on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Memory Function
Does it have a memory function?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
No
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
Saves last used settings for faster next sessions.
In the battle of Memory Function,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Memory Function on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Multi-user Profile
Can it store multiple user profiles?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
No
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
Allows multiple people to save personalized settings.
In the battle of Multi-user Profile,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Multi-user Profile on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
88
Philips Lumea 9900
0Votes
130
vs
Flash Count per Charge
The Philips Lumea 9900 offers approximately 130 flashes per charge, providing enough for targeted sessions without constant recharging—an edge over the always-plugged SmoothSkin Bare+.
Number of flashes supported before recharging is required.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Flash Count per Charge on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
1.67
hr
0Votes
vs
Charging Time
The Philips model takes about 1.67 hours to charge, which is relatively quick for a cordless IPL device. SmoothSkin Bare+ doesn’t charge, so users trade flexibility for consistent plug-in power.
Time required to fully recharge the battery.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Time on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
90
Philips Lumea 9900
0Votes
Li-ion
vs
Battery Type
The Philips Lumea 9900 uses a lithium-ion battery for cordless power, while SmoothSkin Bare+ is wired only. The rechargeable setup in Philips improves portability and reduces cable clutter during use.
Defines what type of battery is used.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Type on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
85
Philips Lumea 9900
0Votes
AC Adapter
vs
Charging Method
Philips Lumea 9900 charges via an AC adapter, whereas SmoothSkin Bare+ lacks a charging system. This reinforces the Philips device’s hybrid flexibility for home or travel use.
Type of charging system used.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Method on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Philips Lumea 9900 supports pass-through charging, enabling use while plugged in. SmoothSkin Bare+ doesn’t need it but lacks this flexibility, giving Philips a practical advantage for continuous operation.
Can be used while charging.
In the battle of Pass-through Charging,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Pass-through Charging on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Philips Lumea 9900 includes a battery indicator to monitor charge levels, while SmoothSkin Bare+ does not. This makes Philips more convenient for cordless scheduling and ensures you won’t run out mid-treatment.
Shows charge level with LED or display.
In the battle of Battery Indicator,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Indicator on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
The Philips Lumea 9900 includes overcharge protection, while the SmoothSkin Bare+ lacks this since it’s not battery-operated. This safety feature prolongs battery health and enhances charging safety for cordless use.
Prevents battery damage from overcharging.
In the battle of Overcharge Protection,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Overcharge Protection on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Battery Capacity
What is the battery capacity?
Who knows?
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Capacity of the internal battery in milliamp hours.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Capacity on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Battery Life per Charge
How long does the battery last per charge?
Who knows?
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Maximum runtime on a single full charge.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Life per Charge on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Charging Port Type
What type of charging port does it use?
Who knows?
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
89
Philips Lumea 9900
0Votes
Proprietary
Identifies port type for charging compatibility.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Port Type on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Fast Charging Support
Does it support fast charging?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
No
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
Allows faster than normal charging times.
In the battle of Fast Charging Support,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Fast Charging Support on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Wireless Charging Support
Does it support wireless charging?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
No
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
Can charge via wireless dock or pad.
In the battle of Wireless Charging Support,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Wireless Charging Support on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Battery Replaceable
Is the battery replaceable?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
No
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
Whether the battery can be replaced by user.
In the battle of Battery Replaceable,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Replaceable on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Battery Cycle Life
What is the battery cycle life?
Who knows?
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Number of full charges the battery supports before degrading.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Cycle Life on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Auto Power-off on Low Battery
Does it power off automatically on low battery?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
No
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
Device shuts off automatically when battery is too low.
In the battle of Auto Power-off on Low Battery,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Auto Power-off on Low Battery on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
The Philips Lumea 9900 includes a face attachment for targeted facial use, while SmoothSkin Bare+ does not. This makes Philips better for precise hair removal on small or delicate areas.
Special head designed for facial hair removal.
In the battle of Face Attachment,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Face Attachment on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Philips Lumea 9900 provides a specific body attachment for larger surface coverage, which the Bare+ lacks. This enables faster, more efficient sessions for legs and arms.
Wider head for treating large body areas.
In the battle of Body Attachment,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Body Attachment on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Philips Lumea 9900 includes a bikini attachment for sensitive zones, while SmoothSkin Bare+ doesn’t. This ensures safer, more comfortable results in delicate areas.
Narrower head for sensitive bikini area.
In the battle of Bikini Attachment,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Bikini Attachment on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
The Philips Lumea 9900 adds a dedicated underarm attachment absent in SmoothSkin Bare+. It provides a contoured fit that enhances coverage in tighter spaces like the armpits.
Specifically designed for underarm treatment.
In the battle of Underarm Attachment,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Underarm Attachment on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
SmoothSkin Bare+ has a skin contact sensor attachment that Philips Lumea 9900 lacks, improving safety by preventing accidental flashes unless properly positioned on the skin.
Attachment with enhanced contact sensor for safe use.
In the battle of Skin Contact Sensor Attachment,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
better than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
, delivering
higher
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Skin Contact Sensor Attachment on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Philips includes a travel pouch, while SmoothSkin Bare+ omits one. The pouch helps organize accessories and makes Philips more suitable for frequent travelers.
Carrying pouch or bag for portability.
In the battle of Travel Pouch/Bag,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Travel Pouch/Bag on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Philips Lumea 9900 ships with a sturdy storage case; SmoothSkin Bare+ does not. This adds protection for long-term storage and easier portability.
Hard or soft case to store device and accessories.
In the battle of Storage Case,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Storage Case on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Number of Attachments
How many attachments are included?
Who knows?
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
80
Philips Lumea 9900
0Votes
4
Total count of interchangeable heads included.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Number of Attachments on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Precision Attachment
Does it include a precision attachment?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
No
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
Small head for targeted treatment areas.
In the battle of Precision Attachment,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Precision Attachment on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Cooling Gel Pack
Does it include a cooling gel pack?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
No
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
Helps soothe skin before or after treatment.
In the battle of Cooling Gel Pack,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cooling Gel Pack on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Protective Eyewear
Does it come with protective eyewear?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
No
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
Safety glasses to protect eyes from light pulses.
In the battle of Protective Eyewear,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Protective Eyewear on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Cleaning Brush
Does it include a cleaning brush?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
No
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
Small brush for cleaning attachments.
In the battle of Cleaning Brush,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cleaning Brush on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Replacement Lamp Cartridge
Does it include replacement lamp cartridges?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
No
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
Extra lamp cartridges provided with the package.
In the battle of Replacement Lamp Cartridge,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Replacement Lamp Cartridge on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Adapter/Charger
Does it come with an adapter or charger?
Yes
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
Yes
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
Confirms whether power adapter or charger is included.
In the battle of Adapter/Charger,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
, delivering
lower
9 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Adapter/Charger on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
The Bare+ operates between 41–104°F (5–40°C), while the Philips Lumea 9900 limits to 41–95°F (5–35°C). The broader range in Bare+ supports reliable function in warmer conditions.
vs
Score History
Updated at 2025-12-11 05:02:03: 0Updated at 2025-12-23 03:19:23: 82Updated at 2026-04-02 04:58:41: 80
Score info for SmoothSkin Bare+:
We base our scoring on 'Operating Temperature Range' on the following:
Score 80: Moderate range, does not cover below freezing.. Score reduced because release date is older
Safe temperature range for device use.
In the battle of Operating Temperature Range,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
, delivering
lower
35 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Operating Temperature Range on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
SmoothSkin Bare+ uses ABS plastic, while Philips Lumea 9900 opts for polycarbonate. ABS is lightweight and durable, but polycarbonate offers greater impact resistance, giving Philips better build toughness.
Material strength and durability.
In the battle of Material Durability,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
, delivering
lower
34 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Material Durability on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
85
Philips Lumea 9900
0Votes
IP22
vs
IP Rating
Philips Lumea 9900 carries an IP22 rating for protection against small particles and dripping water, while SmoothSkin Bare+ has no rating. This gives Philips an advantage in safety for humid environments.
Defines water and dust resistance.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
IP Rating on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs
Lifespan Rating
SmoothSkin Bare+ lists a 10-year lifespan, while Philips Lumea 9900 doesn’t specify one. A defined lifespan assures users of long-term reliability and consistent performance.
Expected operational lifetime.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Lifespan Rating on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Storage Temperature Range
What is the storage temperature range?
73
SmoothSkin Bare+
0Votes
-13–158°F
87
Philips Lumea 9900
0Votes
-13–158°F
SmoothSkin Bare+
Converts to -25–70°C, meaning the device tolerates a wide range of storage conditions—just keep it dry.
Philips Lumea 9900
Equals -25–70 °C, safe for storage in most home or travel conditions.
vs
Score History
Updated at 2025-12-11 05:02:03: 0Updated at 2025-12-23 03:19:23: 80Updated at 2026-04-02 04:58:41: 82
Score info for SmoothSkin Bare+:
We base our scoring on 'Storage Temperature Range' on the following:
Score 82: Widest temperature range with lowest lower and highest upper limit.. Score reduced because release date is older
Safe temperature range for storing the device.
In the battle of Storage Temperature Range,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
, delivering
lower
14 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Storage Temperature Range on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Recyclable Materials
Is it made with recyclable materials?
Yes
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
Yes
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
Philips Lumea 9900
Philips supports electronic recycling; check local e-waste programs for proper disposal.
Uses recyclable or eco-friendly materials.
In the battle of Recyclable Materials,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
, delivering
lower
10 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Recyclable Materials on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Shock Resistance
Is it shock resistant?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
No
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
Withstands accidental drops or impacts.
In the battle of Shock Resistance,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Shock Resistance on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Sustainability Certification
What sustainability certification does it have?
Who knows?
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Eco-certification showing sustainability.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Sustainability Certification on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Energy Efficiency Rating
What is the energy efficiency rating?
Who knows?
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Indicates efficiency of power consumption.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Energy Efficiency Rating on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Heat Resistance
Is it heat resistant?
Yes
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
Yes
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
Withstands high temperatures during extended use.
In the battle of Heat Resistance,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
, delivering
lower
9 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Heat Resistance on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
UV Resistance
Is it UV resistant?
Yes
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
Yes
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
Resistant to UV-related discoloration or damage.
In the battle of UV Resistance,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
, delivering
lower
7 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
UV Resistance on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Moisture Resistance
Is it moisture resistant?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
No
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
Protects against moisture and humidity.
In the battle of Moisture Resistance,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
same as
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Moisture Resistance on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Build Quality Rating
What is the build quality rating?
Who knows?
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Score of overall construction quality.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Build Quality Rating on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Philips Lumea 9900 includes a quick start guide, while SmoothSkin Bare+ does not. This helps new users get set up faster without reading the full manual—ideal for first-time IPL users.
Step-by-step setup guide for first use.
In the battle of Quick Start Guide,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Quick Start Guide on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Philips Lumea 9900 adds a cleaning cloth for lens care, whereas SmoothSkin Bare+ omits it. Maintaining a clean lens ensures consistent performance and extends the device’s effective lifespan.
Special cloth for device cleaning.
In the battle of Cleaning Cloth,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cleaning Cloth on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Philips Lumea 9900 uses eco-friendly packaging; SmoothSkin Bare+ does not. Sustainable packaging appeals to environmentally conscious consumers looking for greener beauty tech choices.
Packaging made from recyclable/eco materials.
In the battle of Eco-friendly Packaging,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Eco-friendly Packaging on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Box Design
What is the box design like?
44
SmoothSkin Bare+
0Votes
Standard
85
Philips Lumea 9900
0Votes
Standard
Description of the packaging style.
In the battle of Box Design,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
, delivering
lower
41 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Box Design on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Protective Inserts
Does it include protective inserts?
Yes
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
Yes
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
Foam or cardboard inserts to protect device.
In the battle of Protective Inserts,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
, delivering
lower
9 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Protective Inserts on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Carrying Case Included
Is a carrying case included?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
Yes
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
Dedicated case inside packaging.
In the battle of Carrying Case Included,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Carrying Case Included on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
User Manual
Does it include a user manual?
Yes
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
Yes
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
Printed or digital manual included.
In the battle of User Manual,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
, delivering
lower
10 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
User Manual on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Multilingual Manual
Is the manual multilingual?
Yes
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
Yes
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
Manual available in multiple languages.
In the battle of Multilingual Manual,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
, delivering
lower
12 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Multilingual Manual on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Warranty Card
Is a warranty card included?
Yes
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
Yes
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
Physical card or registration form for warranty.
In the battle of Warranty Card,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
, delivering
lower
9 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Warranty Card on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Protective Pouch
Is a protective pouch included?
No
0Votes
SmoothSkin Bare+
Yes
0Votes
Philips Lumea 9900
Pouch for storage or travel included.
In the battle of Protective Pouch,
SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉ is
worse than
Philips Lumea 9900 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Protective Pouch on SmoothSkin Bare+ ◉
vs Philips Lumea 9900 ◉ and help others decide!
Surveys
Because hot takes deserve votes.
Effectiveness
How effective is this IPL & Laser Hair Removal device at reducing hair growth over time?
Excellent results — Over 90% hair reduction after a few sessions
0Votes
0Votes
Good results — Around 75% hair reduction after several sessions
0Votes
0Votes
Moderate results — About 50% hair reduction with regular use
0Votes
0Votes
Minimal results — Less than 30% hair reduction even after consistent use
0Votes
0Votes
No visible results — Almost no change after multiple sessions
0Votes
0Votes
Speed
How fast can this IPL & Laser Hair Removal device complete a full treatment session?
Very fast — Under 10 minutes
0Votes
0Votes
Fast — 10 to 20 minutes
0Votes
0Votes
Average speed — 20 to 30 minutes
0Votes
0Votes
Slow — 30 to 45 minutes
0Votes
0Votes
Very slow — Over 45 minutes
0Votes
0Votes
Comfort
How comfortable is this IPL & Laser Hair Removal device to use on the skin during treatment?
Very comfortable — Gentle with little to no heat sensation
0Votes
0Votes
Comfortable — Mild warmth, easy to tolerate
0Votes
0Votes
Fairly comfortable — Noticeable warmth but manageable
0Votes
0Votes
Slightly uncomfortable — Occasional stinging or heat
0Votes
0Votes
Uncomfortable — Painful or irritating on sensitive skin
0Votes
0Votes
Ease of Setup
How easy is it to set up and operate this IPL & Laser Hair Removal device?
Very easy — Ready to use right out of the box
0Votes
0Votes
Easy — Quick setup with clear instructions
0Votes
0Votes
Moderate — Takes some time to learn
0Votes
0Votes
Complicated — Setup is confusing or takes effort
0Votes
0Votes
Difficult — Hard to set up and operate
0Votes
0Votes
Design
How appealing and well-built is the design of this IPL & Laser Hair Removal device?
Sleek and sturdy — Feels premium and durable
0Votes
0Votes
Modern and solid — Good materials and design
0Votes
0Votes
Decent — Functional but not very stylish
0Votes
0Votes
Basic — Feels light or cheap
0Votes
0Votes
Poor — Flimsy design and low-quality build
0Votes
0Votes
Noise Level
How quiet is this IPL & Laser Hair Removal device during operation?
Whisper quiet — Barely noticeable sound
0Votes
0Votes
Quiet — Low, soft noise
0Votes
0Votes
Moderate — Noticeable hum but not distracting
0Votes
0Votes
Noisy — Loud enough to be annoying
0Votes
0Votes
Very noisy — Disturbing or unpleasant noise level
0Votes
0Votes
Lamp or Cartridge Longevity
How long does the lamp or cartridge of this IPL & Laser Hair Removal device last before replacement?
Very durable — Over 500,000 flashes
0Votes
0Votes
Durable — 300,000 to 500,000 flashes
0Votes
0Votes
Moderate lifespan — 150,000 to 300,000 flashes
0Votes
0Votes
Short lifespan — 50,000 to 150,000 flashes
0Votes
0Votes
Very short lifespan — Under 50,000 flashes
0Votes
0Votes
Skin Tone and Hair Type
How well does this IPL & Laser Hair Removal device work across different skin tones and hair types?
Highly versatile — Works effectively on most tones and hair types
0Votes
0Votes
Broadly compatible — Works well for many users
0Votes
0Votes
Moderate compatibility — Works for common skin and hair types
0Votes
0Votes
Limited — Only suitable for certain tones or hair colors
0Votes
0Votes
Poor — Works for very few users
0Votes
0Votes
Results
How satisfied are users with the consistency of results from this IPL & Laser Hair Removal device?
Very satisfied — Reliable, consistent results every time
0Votes
0Votes
Satisfied — Mostly consistent with minor variations
0Votes
0Votes
Neutral — Mixed results depending on usage
0Votes
0Votes
Dissatisfied — Often inconsistent outcomes
0Votes
0Votes
Very dissatisfied — Rarely produces expected results
0Votes
0Votes
Pricing
How would you rate the pricing of this IPL & Laser Hair Removal device compared to its performance and quality?
Recaptor
0
Cartling
20
